Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add 0fuk/OpenACCP --skill handoff-consume-openaccpgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/0fuk/OpenACCPWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/0fuk/openaccp/handoff-consume-openaccp)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/0fuk/openaccp/handoff-consume-openaccp"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/0fuk/openaccp/handoff-consume-openaccp/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/0fuk/openaccp/handoff-consume-openaccp"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/0fuk/openaccp/handoff-consume-openaccp.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.00453 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00227 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00091 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00045 |
Grade A, and why
handoff-consume-openaccp scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Handoff Consume OpenACCP
Validate structure, check scope against task card, review verification evidence, inspect risks, consider reviewer recommendation, and decide accepted, amend, split-follow-up, rejected, or blocked.
Handoff presence is not acceptance.
Every consume should produce or return a consume-result artifact. Frontier consume results are provisional unless Primary explicitly granted final authority, which should not be the default. Final consume results belong to Primary or the human owner.
Consume Rules
Before consume, check:
- handoff exists and is readable,
- task card or source authority matches the claimed work,
- changed artifacts fit allowed scope,
- forbidden files or effects were not touched,
- verification evidence is present and specific,
- skipped checks are explained,
- reviewer recommendation is considered when available,
- final-state claims are not made by non-final roles.
Use consume results to drive the next dispatch. If the handoff is incomplete, send it back for amendment or dispatch reviewer/discovery work instead of treating it as done.
If consuming a Frontier return or Primary-ready packet with a final accepted decision, cite the closure closureId, laneId, or path in basisRefs, then validate the consume-result with that frontier-closure. A closure file is evidence; it is not final acceptance by itself.
Consume Result Fields
Record:
- consumeId,
- responseId,
- consumerRole,
- authorityScope,
- targetHandoffIds,
- targetReviewIds,
- decision,
- basisRefs,
- evidenceStatus,
- claimsAccepted,
- claimsRejected,
- remainingRisks,
- authorityLimits,
- nextActions.
Validate with:
openaccp-validate --artifact <consume-result.json> --ruleset consume-result --strict
# Only for final accepted Frontier return or Primary-ready packet consume:
openaccp-validate --artifact <consume-result.json> --ruleset consume-result --frontier-closure <frontier-closure.json> --strict
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 57 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 6066bd6c5e29
handoff-consume-openaccp is a skill published in the GitHub repository 0fuk/OpenACCP (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 453 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
hive-mind-advanced
Advanced Hive Mind collective intelligence system for queen-led multi-agent coordination with consensus mechanisms and persistent memory.
handoff-mesh
Built-in communication layer for multi-agent setups. Full-mesh handoff folders (any agent can hand off to any other), an hourly watcher that surfaces open handoffs, weekly archive cleanup, and a completion-reporting loop so every handoff is handled AND verified. The durable 'brain' counterpart to real-time channels…
agent-teams
Coordinates Claude agent teams via filesystem protocol. Use when orchestrating parallel agents with task dependencies. Do not use for single-agent tasks.
orchestrate
This skill should be used when the user asks to 'orchestrate a task', 'break down work into parallel agents', 'coordinate subtasks', 'run agents in parallel', or mentions 'multi-agent'. Decomposes complex tasks into tracked subtasks, dispatches parallel subagents, and coordinates until completion.
agent-orchestration
Agent orchestration patterns for agentic loops, multi-agent coordination, alternative frameworks, and multi-scenario workflows. Use when building autonomous agent loops, coordinating multiple agents, evaluating CrewAI/AutoGen/Swarm, or orchestrating complex multi-step scenarios.
silicon-steward
A planning guide for coordinating work between a person and a coding agent. It turns required information, resources, feedback, actions, and handoffs into explicit checklists and protocols.