Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add 0p9b/TLDR --skill tldr-commitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/0p9b/TLDRWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/0p9b/tldr/tldr-commit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/0p9b/tldr/tldr-commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/0p9b/tldr/tldr-commit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/0p9b/tldr/tldr-commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/0p9b/tldr/tldr-commit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.00628 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.00251 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00126 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
tldr-commit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to caveman-commit — 13 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Write commit messages terse and exact. Conventional Commits format. No fluff. Why over what.
Rules
Subject line:
<type>(<scope>): <imperative summary>—<scope>optional- Types:
feat,fix,refactor,perf,docs,test,chore,build,ci,style,revert - Imperative mood: "add", "fix", "remove" — not "added", "adds", "adding"
- ≤50 chars when possible, hard cap 72
- No trailing period
- Match project convention for capitalization after the colon
Body (only if needed):
- Skip entirely when subject is self-explanatory
- Add body only for: non-obvious why, breaking changes, migration notes, linked issues
- Wrap at 72 chars
- Bullets
-not* - Reference issues/PRs at end:
Closes #42,Refs #17
What NEVER goes in:
- "This commit does X", "I", "we", "now", "currently" — the diff says what
- "As requested by..." — use Co-authored-by trailer
- "Generated with Claude Code" or any AI attribution
- Emoji (unless project convention requires)
- Restating the file name when scope already says it
Examples
Diff: new endpoint for user profile with body explaining the why
- ❌ "feat: add a new endpoint to get user profile information from the database"
- ✅
feat(api): add GET /users/:id/profile Mobile client needs profile data without the full user payload to reduce LTE bandwidth on cold-launch screens. Closes #128
Diff: breaking API change
- ✅
feat(api)!: rename /v1/orders to /v1/checkout BREAKING CHANGE: clients on /v1/orders must migrate to /v1/checkout before 2026-06-01. Old route returns 410 after that date.
Auto-Clarity
Always include body for: breaking changes, security fixes, data migrations, anything reverting a prior commit. Never compress these into subject-only — future debuggers need the context.
Boundaries
Only generates the commit message. Does not run git commit, does not stage files, does not amend. Output the message as a code block ready to paste. "stop tldr-commit" or "normal mode": revert to verbose commit style.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 65 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A f6ecc749e8d0
tldr-commit is a skill published in the GitHub repository 0p9b/TLDR (23 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 628 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to caveman-commit, differing in 13 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
commit
Create git commits with good messages. Use when user says "commit", "create commit", or asks to commit changes.
guardian
Gatekeeping Git/PR by classifying change essence and recommending granularity, naming, and strategy; the ship recipe also executes PR delivery (create, CI watch, merge, cleanup) with Ask First on merge. Use when PR preparation, commit strategy, or gated PR delivery is needed.
cross-repo-cache
Check if cross-repo coordinator results can be reused, avoiding redundant Sonnet agent launches. Compares peer repo git hashes against stored hashes from last coordinator run. Triggers on: entering Phase 1.4.1, checking cross-repo cache, before discovering peers. Returns CROSSREPOCACHEHIT with cached status or…
trail
Investigating git history, analyzing regression root causes, and performing code archaeology. Time-travels through commits to uncover truth. Use for git history investigation.
git-expert
Expert-level Git version control with advanced workflows, branching strategies, and best practices for team collaboration. Use when the user mentions version control, collaboration, or workflow, or when the task involves Essential Git Commands, Advanced Git Techniques, Branching Strategies, or Conflict Resolution.
experiment-loop
Autonomous benchmark-driven experiment loop: propose a change, measure the metric, keep what improves it, revert what doesn't, repeat. Git is the ledger — every kept improvement is a commit. Every discarded attempt is a clean revert.