Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add 0x-Shashi/WEB3-AUDIT-SKILLS --skill static-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/0x-Shashi/WEB3-AUDIT-SKILLSWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/0x-shashi/web3-audit-skills/static-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/0x-shashi/web3-audit-skills/static-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/0x-shashi/web3-audit-skills/static-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/0x-shashi/web3-audit-skills/static-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/0x-shashi/web3-audit-skills/static-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.01423 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00711 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00285 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00142 |
Grade A, and why
static-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 211 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A fbef82e9fca1
static-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository 0x-Shashi/WEB3-AUDIT-SKILLS (59 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 1,423 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
analyzing-ethereum-smart-contract-vulnerabilities
Perform static and symbolic analysis of Solidity smart contracts using Slither and Mythril to detect reentrancy, integer overflow, access control, and other vulnerability classes before deployment to Ethereum mainnet.
analyzing-ethereum-smart-contract-vulnerabilities
Perform static and symbolic analysis of Solidity smart contracts using Slither and Mythril to detect reentrancy, integer overflow, access control, and other vulnerability classes before deployment to Ethereum mainnet.
analyzing-ethereum-smart-contract-vulnerabilities
Use when perform static and symbolic analysis of Solidity smart contracts using Slither and Mythril to detect reentrancy, integer overflow, access control, and other vulnerability classes before deployment to Ethereum mainnet. Use when performing static and symbolic analysis of solidity smart contracts using.
security-audit
Smart contract security auditing authority — reentrancy, flash loan attacks, oracle manipulation, access control vulnerabilities, integer overflow/underflow, front-running, signature replay, proxy storage collisions, static analysis with Slither and Mythril, fuzz testing with Echidna, and professional audit report…
auditing-foundry-smart-contract-security
Pre-deployment security audit of Solidity smart contracts in a Foundry project. Combines static analysis (Slither, Aderyn), symbolic execution (Mythril), and property-based testing (forge fuzz + invariant tests with handlers) to catch reentrancy, access-control, oracle/price manipulation, and arithmetic bugs BEFORE…
analyzing-ethereum-smart-contract-vulnerabilities
A security-analysis guide for Solidity smart contracts, which are programs that run on the Ethereum blockchain. It uses Slither and Mythril to inspect contract code and execution paths for vulnerabilities.