Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add 0xabrar/gstack-distilled --skill review-and-debuggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/0xabrar/gstack-distilledWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/0xabrar/gstack-distilled/review-and-debug)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/0xabrar/gstack-distilled/review-and-debug"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/0xabrar/gstack-distilled/review-and-debug.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.01163 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00581 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00233 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00116 |
Grade A, and why
review-and-debug scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 156 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 66af23b906c8
review-and-debug is a skill published in the GitHub repository 0xabrar/gstack-distilled (12 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,163 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
reasoning-semiformally
Apply semi-formal certificate reasoning to code analysis — patch verification, fault localization, patch equivalence. Use when reviewing patches, hunting bugs across scopes, comparing fixes, or when code reasoning requires tracing execution across files/modules. Triggers on code review, bug localization, patch…
senior-engineering-partner
A strict code reviewer, pair programmer, debugger, and mentor for Python, Bash, Google Apps Script, JavaScript, and Swift/Apple platforms. Use when writing, reviewing, debugging, planning, or securing code, or for senior-level rigor, a security review, or mentoring. Mode triggers — REVIEW: (critique + refactor)…
godaudits
Audit a codebase end to end and emit validated JSON plus remediation MDX, or review one diff for non-obvious blast radius with explicit safety facts and a compiled merge proof gate. godaudits fingerprints the repository, detects six project forms, validates Pillars 1.1 and arc-ready artifacts, evaluates 437 checks…
codemap
Generate and incrementally maintain an interactive architecture map plus a per-module code-quality audit (health scores 0-100, smell findings, lines-of-code, and a clickable dependency graph) for any codebase. Use when the user wants to visualize a project's functional modules, audit or score code quality, check…
refactoring-patterns
Code refactoring patterns with before/after diffs for extract method, extract class, inline, move, rename, dead code removal, dependency injection, and code smell detection.
adversarial-reviewer
Adversarial code review that assumes bugs exist and hunts for them. Use when asked to review code, find bugs, audit for correctness, stress-test a PR, or when someone says "tear this apart" or "what's wrong with this". Give no benefit of the doubt — every line is guilty until proven innocent.