Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add 0xrafasec/ai-workflow --skill fixgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/0xrafasec/ai-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/0xrafasec/ai-workflow/fix)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/0xrafasec/ai-workflow/fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/0xrafasec/ai-workflow/fix/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/0xrafasec/ai-workflow/fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/0xrafasec/ai-workflow/fix.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00089 | $0.01240 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00036 | $0.00496 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00248 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00124 |
Grade A, and why
fix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 75 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Fix the bug described in $ARGUMENTS.
Parse Arguments
The argument can be:
- Bug description:
/fix users can't login when password contains special chars - Issue link:
/fix https://github.com/org/repo/issues/42
Branch
Before writing code, ensure you are on a short-lived branch named fix/<slug>. If currently on main/master, create the branch now. See the global Trunk-Based Workflow in root CLAUDE.md for branch/worktree conventions.
Steps
-
Understand the bug
- If given an issue link: fetch it with
gh issue viewand read the full description, comments, and labels. - If given a description: use it directly.
- Check for existing docs (
CLAUDE.md,README.md,docs/) to understand the project context.
- If given an issue link: fetch it with
-
Reproduce and locate
- Search the codebase for the relevant code paths (use Grep, Glob, read key files).
- Identify the component, module, or layer where the bug lives.
- If there are existing tests, run them to see the current failure state.
- If reproduction requires specific steps, tell the user what you're doing.
-
Diagnose root cause
- Read the relevant code carefully. Trace the data flow from input to failure point.
- Check
git logon the affected files for recent changes that may have introduced the bug. - Identify the root cause — not just the symptom. Explain it to the user in 1-2 sentences before proceeding.
-
Discover test strategy — Before writing the fix, understand the project's test approach:
a. Check for TDD: Read
docs/TECHNICAL_DESIGN_DOCUMENT.md— if it has a Testing Strategy section, follow it. b. If no TDD: Infer from the codebase — look for existing test directories, frameworks, patterns, and naming conventions (same discovery as/featurestep 3b). c. Determine which test layers the bug touches — a bug in a pure function needs a unit test; a bug in an API endpoint needs an integration test; a bug in a user flow may need an e2e test.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 75 lines · 89 tokens per session scan A 682de44d349a
fix is a skill published in the GitHub repository 0xrafasec/ai-workflow (9 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 89 tokens to every session and 1,240 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
debug-optimize-lcp
Guides debugging and optimizing Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) using Chrome DevTools MCP tools. Use this skill whenever the user asks about LCP performance, slow page loads, Core Web Vitals optimization, or wants to understand why their page's main content takes too long to appear. Also use when the user mentions…
systematic-debugging
Use when debugging a failing test, build error, or runtime issue that isn't immediately obvious. Guides a 4-phase root cause analysis instead of random fix attempts.
log-error-digest
Analyze log files to troubleshoot errors, identify peak error periods, and produce error clustering, frequency statistics, and time distribution reports. Supports JSON, syslog, and Nginx formats with automatic detection. Use when a user uploads a .log file and asks to analyze errors, find patterns, debug issues, or…
cwv-optimizer
Diagnose and fix Core Web Vitals issues on AEM Edge Delivery Services pages. Goes deeper than generic CWV advice by understanding EDS-specific performance patterns including the 100KB LCP budget, E-L-D loading phases, block rendering behavior, and third-party script impact. Produces specific fixes for LCP, CLS, and…
incident-response-incident-response
Coordinate production incident triage, mitigation, investigation, recovery, and follow-up. Use when responding to outages or other incidents that require structured operational coordination.
ci-fixer
CI failures - read error, minimal fix, verify.