Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add 0xranx/agentbrief --skill regression-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/0xranx/agentbriefWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/0xranx/agentbrief/regression-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/0xranx/agentbrief/regression-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/0xranx/agentbrief/regression-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/0xranx/agentbrief/regression-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/0xranx/agentbrief/regression-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.00674 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00270 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00135 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00067 |
Grade A, and why
regression-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Regression Testing
You are writing tests specifically to prevent regressions — bugs that were fixed but could come back.
Process
1. Identify Regression Risks
High-risk areas for regressions:
- Code that was recently fixed (the fix might be incomplete)
- Code that's frequently modified (high churn = high risk)
- Code with complex conditional logic (many branches = many ways to break)
- Code at integration boundaries (where two systems meet)
- Code without any existing tests
2. Write Characterization Tests
Before changing any code, capture current behavior:
// Characterization test: documents current behavior
// If this test breaks during refactoring, you changed behavior (intentionally or not)
it('should return empty array when no items match filter', () => {
const result = filterItems([], { status: 'active' });
expect(result).toEqual([]);
});
3. Write Regression Tests for Fixed Bugs
Every bug fix needs a regression test:
// Regression: https://github.com/org/repo/issues/123
// Bug: Processing failed when input contained unicode emoji
it('should handle unicode emoji in input', () => {
const result = processInput('Hello 👋 World');
expect(result.text).toBe('Hello 👋 World');
});
Rules for regression tests:
- Reference the original issue/bug in a comment
- Test the exact scenario that triggered the bug
- Test close variants (if emoji broke it, test other unicode too)
- Place near related tests, not in a separate "regression" file
4. Coverage-Guided Test Writing
Find untested code paths:
# Generate coverage report
pnpm test --coverage
# Look for:
# - Uncovered branches (if/else paths never hit)
# - Uncovered functions (dead code or missing tests?)
# - Low-coverage files (< 60% line coverage)
Prioritize coverage for:
- Public API functions (users depend on these)
- Error handling paths (failures should be predictable)
- Edge cases in business logic
- Data validation and transformation
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 96 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 41cf681df327
regression-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository 0xranx/agentbrief (45 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 674 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
loop-engineering
A guide to building reliable loops for AI agents that plan, act, check their work, and continue until a task is truly complete. It includes independent verification and a proposer-reviewer pattern in which one agent's work is checked using outside evidence.
agent-evaluation
A guide to measuring whether an AI agent works reliably on the tasks that matter. It covers repeatable test environments, program checks, human-like scoring rules, failure analysis, and experiments that separate model problems from system problems.
bad-case-to-dpo
A guide to turning failed production agent runs into training and evaluation data. It explains how to find the first mistake, create preference examples for DPO (Direct Preference Optimization), and check that a fix does not damage other tasks.
eval-dataset-design
A guide to creating reliable test sets for AI agents. Each evaluation task includes the request, the simulated user's behaviour, a reset starting state, and a success check that can be independently verified.
tmux-manual-qa
Run a single manual tmux-based QA scenario for the todo continuation feature against the real CLI (./pi-test.sh) in an interactive TUI. Captures scrollback, asserts deterministic pass/fail count markers, and cleans up test fixtures. Use only for the manual-qa milestone features.
test-driven-development
A test-driven development guide. Test-driven development, or TDD, means writing a test first, confirming that it fails, then writing the smallest code that makes it pass and improving the result.