Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to 1024XEngineer/bytemind. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/1024XEngineer/bytemind/main/.agents/skills/bubbletea-code-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/1024XEngineer/bytemindWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/1024xengineer/bytemind/bubbletea-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/1024xengineer/bytemind/bubbletea-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/1024xengineer/bytemind/bubbletea-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/1024xengineer/bytemind/bubbletea-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/1024xengineer/bytemind/bubbletea-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.01222 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00489 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00244 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00122 |
Grade A, and why
bubbletea-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to bubbletea-code-review — 302 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 147 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
BubbleTea Code Review
Quick Reference
| Issue Type | Reference |
|---|---|
| Elm architecture, tea.Cmd as data | references/elm-architecture.md |
| Model state, message handling | references/model-update.md |
| View rendering, Lipgloss styling | references/view-styling.md |
| Component composition, Huh forms | references/composition.md |
| Bubbles components (list, table, etc.) | references/bubbles-components.md |
CRITICAL: Avoid False Positives
Read elm-architecture.md first! The most common review mistake is flagging correct patterns as bugs.
NOT Issues (Do NOT Flag These)
| Pattern | Why It's Correct |
|---|---|
return m, m.loadData() |
tea.Cmd is returned immediately; runtime executes async |
Value receiver on Update() |
Standard BubbleTea pattern; model returned by value |
Nested m.child, cmd = m.child.Update(msg) |
Normal component composition |
Helper functions returning tea.Cmd |
Creates command descriptor, no I/O in Update |
tea.Batch(cmd1, cmd2) |
Commands execute concurrently by runtime |
ACTUAL Issues (DO Flag These)
| Pattern | Why It's Wrong |
|---|---|
os.ReadFile() in Update |
Blocks UI thread |
http.Get() in Update |
Network I/O blocks |
time.Sleep() in Update |
Freezes UI |
<-channel in Update (blocking) |
May block indefinitely |
huh.Form.Run() in Update |
Blocking call |
Review Checklist
Architecture
- No blocking I/O in Update() (file, network, sleep)
- Helper functions returning
tea.Cmdare NOT flagged as blocking - Commands used for all async operations
Model & Update
- Model is immutable (Update returns new model, not mutates)
- Init returns proper initial command (or nil)
- Update handles all expected message types
- WindowSizeMsg handled for responsive layout
- tea.Batch used for multiple commands
- tea.Quit used correctly for exit
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 147 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A fd3217f8aa27
bubbletea-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository 1024XEngineer/bytemind (27 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,222 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to bubbletea-code-review, differing in 302 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
golang-refactoring
Golang refactoring — safe, at-scale restructuring of existing Go code: a coverage-adaptive safety net, behavior-preserving transforms (gopls Rename/Extract, gofmt -r, gopatch), the Fowler catalog mapped to Go, breaking import cycles, and small stacked PRs. Apply when a function or type has grown too large, a code…
design-review
Deep design review of Go codebase — naming, structure, consistency, interfaces, error handling. Scores each dimension and provides actionable fixes.
agents-md
Generate AGENTS.md files for Go, Rust, TypeScript, and Java projects. Use this skill whenever the user asks to create, scaffold, bootstrap, update, or review an AGENTS.md (or agent-instructions, CLAUDE.md, repo guide for agents) file in a codebase. Also trigger when the user says "add AGENTS.md", "make this repo…
code-review-go
Deep Go-specific code review covering goroutine lifecycle, data races, error wrapping, domain modeling, and interface design. Applied in addition to the generic code-review skill when Go code is detected. Invoked when reviewing Go PRs, Go code changes, or performing Go-specific quality checks.
go-code-review
Invoke this skill to systematically review a Go change against community style standards before merging. Walks the diff topic by topic — formatting, errors, naming, concurrency, interfaces, data structures, security, declarations, functions, style, logging, imports, generics, testing — flagging issues with line…
go-core-idioms
Use when writing or reviewing idiomatic sequential Go — error handling, slog logging, generics, interfaces, style. Not for concurrency (go-concurrency).