Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add 1102tools-dev/federal-contracting-skills --skill ot-project-description-buildergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/1102tools-dev/federal-contracting-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/1102tools-dev/federal-contracting-skills/ot-project-description-builder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/1102tools-dev/federal-contracting-skills/ot-project-description-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/1102tools-dev/federal-contracting-skills/ot-project-description-builder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/1102tools-dev/federal-contracting-skills/ot-project-description-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/1102tools-dev/federal-contracting-skills/ot-project-description-builder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00185 | $0.02942 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00093 | $0.01471 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00588 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00294 |
Grade A, and why
ot-project-description-builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 180 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
OT Project Description Builder
Purpose and operating boundary
Create a milestone-based .docx project description for a Research OT under 10 U.S.C. 4021, Prototype OT under 10 U.S.C. 4022, or a follow-on production action under 10 U.S.C. 4022(f). Define the technical outcome, phase logic, deliverables, completion evidence, Government responsibilities, and agreement-specific controls without making the Agreements Officer's authority, participant-status, successful-completion, or follow-on-eligibility determination.
Produce two separate outputs:
- One project-description
.docxsuitable for the agreement file. It contains no cost estimate, should-cost, labor rate, milestone amount, funding profile, Government budget, or pricing conclusion. - One
MILESTONE HANDOFF TABLEin chat after document validation. It is an internal workpaper for OT Cost Analysis and never a document section, appendix, or companion file.
No external API is required.
Reference map
Load only what the active workflow needs:
- authority-and-scope-rules.md before stating authority, participant status, contribution treatment, prototype scope, or follow-on provisions.
- question-blocks.md when collecting or confirming inputs.
- document-specification.md in full before building the
.docx. - professional-product-standard.md before building the
.docx. - handoff-specification.md before presenting the chat-only milestone handoff.
- validation-gates.md before generation and again before delivery.
- runtime-adaptation.md when selecting input, document-generation, rendering, validation, or delivery capabilities.
Non-negotiable gates
- Correct authority: 10 U.S.C. 4021 covers basic, applied, and advanced research. 10 U.S.C. 4022 covers prototype projects. Section 4022(f) covers follow-on production contracts or transactions. Never label a prototype as a 4021 action.
- Authority is supplied, not selected: Explain the three paths when needed, but require the user or Agreements Officer to identify the authority. Do not default an uncertain request to Prototype OT.
- Correct prototype conditions: Under 4022(d)(1), Path A is significant participation by a nontraditional defense contractor or nonprofit research institution; Path B covers all significant non-Government participants being small businesses or nontraditional defense contractors; Path C requires at least one-third of total project cost from non-Federal sources; Path D is a senior procurement executive's written exceptional-circumstances determination. There is no Path D competition-commitment option.
- Status and contribution facts are not inferred: Do not decide nontraditional status, small-business status, significant participation, the applicable 4022(d) path, contribution ratio, contribution valuation, or fee. Record the user's approved facts and source. Research and follow-on production contribution arrangements are also supplied, not defaulted.
- TRL is optional: Use TRL only when supplied or genuinely useful. A prototype can address a proof of concept, model, process, agile development, novel commercial application, operational utility, or a combination. Do not force every project through a hardware-style TRL ladder.
- Milestones precede prose: Present the derived phase and milestone structure, including completion evidence and pending decisions, then end at the approval question. Do not generate the
.docxin the same response. - Artifact separation: Keep pricing, labor hours, contribution arithmetic, cost figures, funding, and skill-routing language out of the document. Keep the milestone handoff in chat only.
- Data rights are negotiated: Record the supplied posture by deliverable and distinguish background from agreement-generated material. Do not state that FAR or DFARS clauses control unless the agreement incorporates them.
- Follow-on language stays conditional: Record user-supplied predecessor, competitive-selection, and successful-completion facts without deciding eligibility. Do not promise award or say 4022(d) is a follow-on requirement.
- Every placeholder closes: Each
[TBD]must name an owner, trigger, and disposition method in Constraints and Assumptions. - Independent document validation: Run the bundled validator, render the document, inspect every page, fix defects, and repeat. Do not treat DOCX creation alone as proof of usability.
What ships with it
11 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/openai.yaml 266 B
- references/authority-and-scope-rules.md 4.6 KB
- references/document-specification.md 6.7 KB
- references/handoff-specification.md 2.1 KB
- references/professional-product-standard.md 5.5 KB
- references/question-blocks.md 3.7 KB
- references/runtime-adaptation.md 1.7 KB
- references/validation-gates.md 3.3 KB
- scripts/validate_docx.py 12 KB runs code
- test.md 4.7 KB
- testing.md 12 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 180 lines · 185 tokens per session scan A 1102329ce895
ot-project-description-builder is a skill published in the GitHub repository 1102tools-dev/federal-contracting-skills (25 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 185 tokens to every session and 2,942 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
checking-submission-compliance
Runs the final production and submission-compliance check on a US Federal proposal before submission. Use when the user needs a submission compliance check, a final compliance review, a production check, a page-count or format check, a forms and certifications check, or a pre-submission checklist for a federal bid.…
shredding-solicitations
Shreds a US Federal solicitation into a requirements and compliance matrix. Use when the user needs to shred or analyze an RFP, RFQ, RFI, or task order, build a compliance matrix or requirements matrix, extract shall statements, or cross-walk Section L instructions, Section M evaluation factors, and the Section…
compliance-audit
Audits codebases against compliance frameworks (SOC2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, GDPR, ISO27001, etc.) using parallel agents per subdirectory/sub-repo. Produces a detailed markdown report with line-level code references. Use when you need to check a directory or monorepo for compliance violations before an audit or review.
Acquisition Diligence Request List
Use when generating a tailored M&A due-diligence request list, organized by workstream, for a buyer or seller in an acquisition.
auditing-commitments
Audits a US Federal proposal draft for the obligations it creates, and flags promises stronger than the solicitation requires. Use when the user needs a commitment audit, a promise review, an obligation review, a check for overcommitting, a review of "we will" and "shall" language, a check that the draft does not…
qualifying-opportunities
Runs a structured bid/no-bid gate review for a US Federal opportunity. Use when deciding whether to pursue or bid a federal solicitation, RFP, RFQ, RFI, sources-sought notice, draft RFP, or IDIQ task order — triggered by requests for a bid/no-bid decision, pursuit decision, gate review, opportunity qualification…