design-pipeline: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/bmad-retrospective/SKILL.md

bmad-retrospective is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from 2233admin/design-pipeline. It costs 56 tokens per session (2,961 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A retrospective workflow for reviewing a completed development epic, meaning a large piece of work made up of related stories. It gathers the epic's documents, changes, commits, status records, and available logs to judge the result against its criteria.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to run an evidence-based retrospective, verify findings against project sources, and render a verdict interactively or without confirmations.
Why use it?
It turns scattered project evidence into traceable findings and an acceptance verdict, including defects that individual stories may not reveal.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

This is 2233admin/design-pipeline's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on design-pipeline itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything design-pipeline configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to 2233admin/design-pipeline. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/2233admin/design-pipeline/main/.agents/skills/bmad-retrospective/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/2233admin/design-pipeline

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for bmad-retrospective

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/2233admin/design-pipeline/bmad-retrospective/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/2233admin/design-pipeline/bmad-retrospective)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/2233admin/design-pipeline/bmad-retrospective"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/2233admin/design-pipeline/bmad-retrospective/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for bmad-retrospective

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/2233admin/design-pipeline/bmad-retrospective"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/2233admin/design-pipeline/bmad-retrospective.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 56 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,961 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00056 $0.02961
Opus 5 $0.00028 $0.01481
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00592
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00296

Measured 10d ago against content hash 8da5b53055af, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

bmad-retrospective scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 4 executable files (scripts/git_evidence.py, scripts/sprint_status.py, scripts/tests/test_git_evidence.py, …), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

.agents/skills/bmad-retrospective/SKILL.md · 95 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 95 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Retrospective

Review a completed epic by reading the evidence it left — the epic spec, story files, the full diff, per-story commits, sprint status, and session logs when they exist. An unattended epic run leaves a record; this skill reads that record, surfaces the defects no single story could show, and judges the epic against the criteria it set for itself.

Every finding you report carries a source reference (file, line, commit, or log). A claim you cannot point at — an invented root cause, a pattern the diff does not actually show — is not a finding. Drop it.

Resolution rules

  • Bare paths and {skill-root} (e.g. references/aggregate-views.md, scripts/sprint_status.py) resolve from this skill's installed directory.
  • {project-root} → the project working directory.
  • {skill-name} → the skill directory's basename.

Modes

Interactive by default. With -H/--headless: skip every confirmation, take the epic from the invocation (falling back to detection only if none was supplied), never open the team discussion, render the verdict on the evidence alone, and record each assumption made without the user (which epic was selected, the machine verdict, each proposed item) into the retrospective document's Assumptions section so the audit trail survives. The Phase 4 acceptance fail-safe still applies in headless runs.

For automation, -H <epic> — an explicit epic in headless mode — is the stable orchestrator-facing interface. Pass the same number to detect-epic --epic <N> so the unfinished-story gate is script-backed (see Inputs). Epic auto-detection is a human convenience, not an automation contract: unflagged detect-epic returns the highest epic with any done story, and stories-mode projects have no sprint-status.yaml to detect from.

On Activation

Run these in order before the retrospective begins:

  1. Resolve the workflow block. Run uv run --no-cache {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py --skill {skill-root} --key workflow. If it fails, resolve {workflow.*} yourself by reading {skill-root}/customize.toml, then {project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.toml, then .user.toml in that order, merging base → team → user (scalars override, keyed arrays-of-tables merge by code/id, other arrays append).
  2. Run prepend steps — execute each entry in {workflow.activation_steps_prepend} in order.
  3. Load persistent facts — treat every {workflow.persistent_facts} entry as standing context. file: entries are paths/globs under {project-root} whose contents load as facts; all others are literal facts.
  4. Load config from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml: project_name, user_name, communication_language, document_output_language, user_skill_level, planning_artifacts, implementation_artifacts, and date (system datetime), plus output_folder from {project-root}/_bmad/core/config.yaml. Speak all output in {communication_language}; write all documents in {document_output_language}. Never state time estimates — AI has changed development speed, so hour/day/week predictions are noise.
  5. Greet and orient (interactive only). Greet {user_name}, name the epic you are about to retro, and optionally invite their going-in concerns ("anything you want weighted — a story that felt rushed, a risky interaction between two stories?"). Use any answer to focus the Phase 1–2 analysis; it directs attention but never becomes a finding without a source.
  6. Run append steps — execute each entry in {workflow.activation_steps_append} in order.

Read the full file on GitHub · 95 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 95 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 8da5b53055af

Subscribe to this mod's changes

bmad-retrospective is a skill published in the GitHub repository 2233admin/design-pipeline (9 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 2,961 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

contribution-workflow

Create or document a contribution workflow for a design system — the multi-stage process for evaluating, accepting, and shepherding new contributions through to publication. Trigger when someone says: how should someone contribute, contribution process, adding a new component, contribution guidelines, what's the…

murphytrueman/design-system-ops · 99 tokens

backlog-generator

Transform audit findings into sprint-ready work items with effort estimates, acceptance criteria, and stakeholder-friendly rationale. This converts existing findings into tickets, NOT the process for contributing new components to the system. Trigger when someone says: generate backlog items, create tickets from…

murphytrueman/design-system-ops · 108 tokens

designlang-tokens

Use when styling UI for cal.com — references the extracted design system tokens instead of inventing colors, spacing, or typography.

Manavarya09/design-extract · 30 tokens

omd-apply

A skill that applies a project's DESIGN.md file as visual and brand guidance for interface work. It covers components, colors, fonts, layout, copy, motion, and visual assets.

kwakseongjae/oh-my-design · 129 tokens

ss-review

Review UI code for design system compliance, accessibility, and best practices.

bitjaru/styleseed · 16 tokens

ss-reference

Compile screenshots, URLs, Figma exports, or an existing UI into a project-local StyleSeed output grammar with evidence, tokens, confidence, anti-patterns, and a validation screen. Use when the user supplies a design reference that StyleSeed does not already model.

bitjaru/styleseed · 56 tokens