Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to 2233admin/design-pipeline. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/2233admin/design-pipeline/main/.agents/skills/bmad-review-edge-case-hunter/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/2233admin/design-pipelineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/2233admin/design-pipeline/bmad-review-edge-case-hunter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/2233admin/design-pipeline/bmad-review-edge-case-hunter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/2233admin/design-pipeline/bmad-review-edge-case-hunter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/2233admin/design-pipeline/bmad-review-edge-case-hunter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/2233admin/design-pipeline/bmad-review-edge-case-hunter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00116 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00058 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00023 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00012 |
Grade A, and why
bmad-review-edge-case-hunter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- bmad-review-edge-case-hunter — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
Merged into bmad-review. Invoke the bmad-review skill on the same content with only the edge-case-hunter lens, passing through any also_consider areas. Output ONLY the raw findings JSON array in the legacy shape: the four standard fields (plus kind/confidence on deletion findings), no lens field, no markdown wrapping, no extra text. [] is valid when nothing is found.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 7 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A f9db1d7f58c5
bmad-review-edge-case-hunter is a skill published in the GitHub repository 2233admin/design-pipeline (9 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 116 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ss-lint
Quick automated lint — detects common design system violations in seconds.
ss-learn
Capture a human-approved UI design lesson as a privacy-minimized local StyleSeed candidate, review it, and prepare an opt-in share package without transmitting project code, prompts, screenshots, or brand data. Use when a person asks StyleSeed to remember, learn from, generalize, review, or prepare a reusable rule…
ss-review
Review UI code for design system compliance, accessibility, and best practices.
component-api-validator
Audit component APIs for consistency, breaking changes, TypeScript coverage, and contract compliance across a component library. Trigger when someone says: component prop review, verify component types are exported, component API audit, check our component interfaces, are our props consistent, API consistency check…
pr-review
Review one or all open pull requests in saadeghi/daisyui with read-only GitHub data and isolated base-versus-PR checks. Use when Codex must verify a PR, find concrete regressions, decide whether it is safe to merge, and write a concise report under tmp/pr/.
designlang-tokens
Use when styling UI for cal.com — references the extracted design system tokens instead of inventing colors, spacing, or typography.