Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/2233admin/reverse-skill-evolver/competition-bundle-sourcemap-recoverynpx skills add 2233admin/reverse-skill-evolver --skill competition-bundle-sourcemap-recoverygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/2233admin/reverse-skill-evolverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/2233admin/reverse-skill-evolver/competition-bundle-sourcemap-recovery)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/2233admin/reverse-skill-evolver/competition-bundle-sourcemap-recovery"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/2233admin/reverse-skill-evolver/competition-bundle-sourcemap-recovery.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00112 | $0.00639 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00056 | $0.00319 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00128 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
competition-bundle-sourcemap-recovery scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to competition-bundle-sourcemap-recovery — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 51 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Competition Bundle Sourcemap Recovery
Use this skill only as a downstream specialization after $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator is already active and has established sandbox assumptions, node ownership, and evidence priorities. If that has not happened yet, return to $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator first.
Use this skill when runtime truth lives in built assets, source maps, chunk tables, or obfuscated loader flow rather than in checked-in source alone.
Reply in Simplified Chinese unless the user explicitly requests English.
Quick Start
- Start from the served artifact set: entry HTML, build manifest, bootstrap bundle, chunk map, and source maps.
- Record chunk ids, route chunks, loader functions, endpoint strings, and config keys before broad manual deobfuscation.
- Reconstruct the smallest runtime graph that explains which asset executes now.
- Keep served artifact truth separate from repository source unless parity is proven.
- Reproduce the smallest asset-to-runtime boundary that proves the decisive behavior.
Workflow
1. Map The Served Artifact Set
- Record entry HTML, script tags, preload hints, manifest files, asset map, chunk registry, and source map URLs.
- Note framework-specific artifacts such as route manifests, client reference manifests, or lazy-loader tables when present.
- Keep emitted filenames, hash suffixes, and route ownership tied together.
2. Reconstruct Runtime Structure
- Follow bootstrap code, chunk loaders, module registry, string decoders, and lazy import boundaries.
- Use source maps, manifest files, and stable symbol clusters to recover route names, API calls, feature flags, and hidden panels.
- Distinguish build-time intent from the bundle that is actively served now.
3. Reduce To The Decisive Bundle Path
- Compress the result to the smallest sequence: served asset -> loader path -> module or symbol -> runtime effect.
- State clearly whether the decisive weakness lives in manifest drift, chunk loading, hidden route code, string decoding, or stale source assumptions.
- If the task shifts from built assets to SSR or template enforcement, hand back to the tighter template-render skill.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 51 lines · 112 tokens per session scan A 8f89baa5ea28
competition-bundle-sourcemap-recovery is a skill published in the GitHub repository 2233admin/reverse-skill-evolver (13 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 112 tokens to every session and 639 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to competition-bundle-sourcemap-recovery, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…