Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/2233admin/reverse-skill-evolver/competition-k8s-control-planenpx skills add 2233admin/reverse-skill-evolver --skill competition-k8s-control-planegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/2233admin/reverse-skill-evolverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/2233admin/reverse-skill-evolver/competition-k8s-control-plane)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/2233admin/reverse-skill-evolver/competition-k8s-control-plane"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/2233admin/reverse-skill-evolver/competition-k8s-control-plane.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00117 | $0.00677 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00059 | $0.00338 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00135 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
competition-k8s-control-plane scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to competition-k8s-control-plane — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 52 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Competition K8s Control Plane
Use this skill only as a downstream specialization after $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator is already active and has established sandbox assumptions, node ownership, and evidence priorities. If that has not happened yet, return to $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator first.
Use this skill when the decisive path runs through Kubernetes control-plane state, API permissions, or controller behavior rather than a single container's runtime alone.
Reply in Simplified Chinese unless the user explicitly requests English.
Quick Start
- Separate manifest intent from live cluster state: API objects, mutations, controllers, secrets, and resulting workloads.
- Identify the active principal first: service account, kubeconfig identity, node credential, webhook, or controller.
- Map the smallest control-plane edge to its workload effect.
- Keep RBAC, service accounts, owner references, namespace boundaries, and secret consumers in compact evidence blocks.
- Reproduce the smallest cluster action that yields the decisive workload or secret effect.
Workflow
1. Map The API Trust Path
- Record namespaces, service accounts, Roles, ClusterRoles, bindings, admission hooks, controllers, and the resources they can mutate.
- Distinguish read access, create access, patch access, exec access, and secret access.
- Keep principal, verb, resource, namespace, and resulting object in one chain.
2. Trace Mutation To Workload State
- Show how an API action becomes a pod, volume mount, secret exposure, env injection, job run, or controller-created artifact.
- Compare checked-in YAML against live objects after defaulting, admission mutation, or controller reconciliation.
- Distinguish pod-runtime behavior from cluster-level mutation logic.
3. Reduce To The Decisive Cluster Path
- Compress the result to the smallest chain: principal -> API permission -> mutated object -> resulting workload, secret, or route effect.
- Keep kube objects, live describes, and consumed secret or config paths tied to the same namespace and controller.
- If the problem narrows down to one container's mount or runtime deviation, switch back to the tighter container-runtime skill.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 52 lines · 117 tokens per session scan A 18fa637d9926
competition-k8s-control-plane is a skill published in the GitHub repository 2233admin/reverse-skill-evolver (13 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 117 tokens to every session and 677 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to competition-k8s-control-plane, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
deploy-docker-compose
Run the Omnigent server as a Docker compose stack (server + Postgres) on any Docker host — your laptop, a VPS, EC2 by hand, or as the base layer of any container-platform deploy. Invoke when the user wants to build the image, bring up the compose stack, debug the stack on a host they already have, or extend the stack…
compute-env-setup
Set up a reproducible Feynman compute environment for research jobs. Use when a task needs Python/R packages, GPU libraries, containers, Modal, SSH, caches, or managed model runtime setup.
securing-kubernetes-on-cloud
This skill covers hardening managed Kubernetes clusters on EKS, AKS, and GKE by implementing Pod Security Standards, network policies, workload identity, RBAC scoping, image admission controls, and runtime security monitoring. It addresses cloud-specific security features including IRSA for EKS, Workload Identity for…
detecting-privilege-escalation-in-kubernetes-pods
Detect and prevent privilege escalation in Kubernetes pods by monitoring security contexts, capabilities, and syscall patterns with Falco and OPA policies.
implementing-rbac-hardening-for-kubernetes
Harden Kubernetes Role-Based Access Control by implementing least-privilege policies, auditing role bindings, eliminating cluster-admin sprawl, and integrating external identity providers.
docker-socket-mount
Docker / containerd socket mounted into a container → host RCE. Common in CI runners, GitOps controllers (ArgoCD, Flux), and 'Docker-in-Docker' setups. Single-command escape via docker run --rm --privileged -v /:/host alpine chroot /host.