Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/2233admin/reverse-skill-evolvernpx agentmods add skills/2233admin/reverse-skill-evolver/patch-diff-exploitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/2233admin/reverse-skill-evolver/patch-diff-exploit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/2233admin/reverse-skill-evolver/patch-diff-exploit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/2233admin/reverse-skill-evolver/patch-diff-exploit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/2233admin/reverse-skill-evolver/patch-diff-exploit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/2233admin/reverse-skill-evolver/patch-diff-exploit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00192 | $0.03647 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00077 | $0.01459 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00038 | $0.00729 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00365 |
Grade A, and why
patch-diff-exploit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to patch-diff-exploit — 17 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 246 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
N-day 补丁差分到利用 (Patch Diff Exploit)
适用范围
当任务属于以下场景时使用本 skill:
- 已知 CVE 但无公开 PoC — 厂商公告写了"修复了 XX 组件的越界写"但没放 PoC,需要从补丁反推
- SRC / 红队打 N-day — 目标资产未及时更新,需要把刚发布的补丁差成可用的 1-day 利用
- Patch Tuesday 跟进 — 每月第二个周二微软放补丁,需要快速锁定高价值漏洞(Kernel / Win32k / AFD / CLFS)
- Linux LTS 补丁分析 — 主线 fix 已合并,但旁支或某发行版 backport 不全,找未修补面
- 驱动 / 服务的安全补丁还原 — 显卡驱动、AV 引擎、虚拟化组件等闭源软件的补丁分析
与其他 skill 的分工
| 场景 | 用什么 |
|---|---|
| 有旧版符号,迁移到新版本帮助分析 | binary-diff/ |
| 从补丁找漏洞、写 PoC 打补丁前版本 | 本 skill |
| 写出完整利用链(堆喷、ROP、提权) | pwn-chain/ |
| 把 1-day 武器化部署到目标网络 | pentest-tools/network-attack-defense/ |
| 从零逆向一个二进制 | ida-reverse/ / radare2/ |
差别的关键:binary-diff 的目标是让新版可分析(把旧符号搬过来),本 skill 的目标是找出补丁修了什么 bug 然后打补丁前的版本。前者服务防御侧 / 研究侧分析,后者服务攻击侧武器化。
核心原理
patched 二进制 (after) unpatched 二进制 (before)
↓ ↓
导入 IDA/Ghidra 导入 IDA/Ghidra
↓ ↓
└──────── BinDiff / ghidriff ──────┘
↓
函数级 diff(matched / unmatched / changed)
↓
聚焦 match score 中等的函数(0.5 - 0.9)
↓
看新增了什么:边界检查 / 锁 / 字段清零 / 整数溢出检查
↓
反推 bug class:OOB / Race / Info Leak / UAF / Integer Overflow
↓
在 unpatched 版本上写 PoC 触发
↓
验证:unpatched 崩 / patched 不崩 → 漏洞确认
补丁修复模式 → 漏洞类型反查:
| 新增内容 | 大概率的 bug class |
|---|---|
if (a + b < a) / __builtin_add_overflow |
整数溢出 |
KeAcquireSpinLock / mutex_lock |
竞争条件 (TOCTOU / double-free) |
if (idx >= MAX) / if (len > buf_size) |
越界读 / 越界写 |
RtlZeroMemory / memset(struct, 0, ...) |
未初始化内存信息泄漏 |
InterlockedDecrement + refcount 检查 |
UAF / 引用计数错误 |
ProbeForRead / ProbeForWrite |
用户态指针未校验 |
SeAccessCheck / capability 校验 |
权限校验缺失 |
删除 / 收紧 IOCTL code |
暴露面收敛(看老接口怎么打) |
工作流
5 步完整流程
Step 1: 拿 before / after 二进制
- Windows: Microsoft Update Catalog 下 MSU/MSP,用 expand.exe / dism 解包
- Linux: 从发行版 USN/RHSA 拉 .deb/.rpm,用 dpkg-deb / rpm2cpio 解包
- 第三方软件: 官网取 N-1 和 N 版本安装包
Step 2: 对齐符号
- 有 PDB 直接吃,没 PDB 时用 binary-diff skill 把 N-1 版本的符号搬到 N 版本
- Linux 内核取对应版本的 vmlinux + System.map / debuginfo
Step 3: 二进制 diff
- BinDiff: 直接给两个 IDB,看函数级匹配结果
- ghidriff: pip 一键安装,CLI 输出 markdown 报告
- Diaphora: IDA 内插件,老牌但需要 IDA Pro
Step 4: 定位变更
- 过滤 match score 0.5-0.95 的函数(完全相同的不看,完全不同的多半是新加 / 重命名)
- 重点看:新增的 if / 新增的循环边界 / 删除的代码块(删了什么也是线索)
- 用 LLM 看 before/after 伪代码反推 bug class(见 references/root-cause-and-poc.md)
Step 5: 写 PoC
- 整数溢出:构造边界值(INT_MAX-1、0xFFFFFFFF)
- 竞争:多线程 hammer,open/close + ioctl 高频并发
- UAF:spray → free → reuse pattern
- OOB:精确控制 len / index 越过边界
- 验证 patched 版本不再崩,unpatched 版本稳定崩 → bug 复现成功
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago Changed 14a12a7e484b
- 1mo ago First seen · 246 lines · 192 tokens per session scan A 500205be0b9d
patch-diff-exploit is a skill published in the GitHub repository 2233admin/reverse-skill-evolver (24 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 192 tokens to every session and 3,647 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to patch-diff-exploit, differing in 17 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
android-reverse-engineering
Decompile Android APK, XAPK, JAR, and AAR files using jadx or Fernflower/Vineflower. Reverse engineer Android apps, extract HTTP API endpoints, trace call flows from UI to network layer, and analyze runtime behavior with Frida, network capture, JNI/SO inspection, and signature generation. Use when the user wants to…
android-reverse-engineering
Decompile Android APK, XAPK, JAR, and AAR files using jadx or Fernflower/Vineflower. Reverse engineer Android apps, extract HTTP API endpoints, trace call flows from UI to network layer, and analyze runtime behavior with Frida, network capture, JNI/SO inspection, and signature generation. Use when the user wants to…
conducting-mobile-application-penetration-test
Perform a mobile application penetration test on Android and iOS apps to identify insecure data storage, certificate pinning bypass, API vulnerabilities, binary protections, and runtime manipulation using Frida, Objection, and MobSF.
engineer-bot-ops
A workflow for carrying an engineering task from scope through implementation and reviewable delivery. It works with a repository's branch, existing changes, rules, checks, and permissions while separating completed, unverified, and next-step work.
argent-tv-interact
Control and inspect TV apps via argent, Apple TV (tvOS), Android TV (leanback), and Amazon Fire TV (Vega). Boot the target, read focus, navigate with the D-pad remote, type, screenshot, and on Vega debug the JS runtime (evaluate, console logs, network inspector). Use when a task targets a TV (runtimeKind "tv", or…
swarm-pr-review
Run a graph-guided, tool-augmented PR review using context packing, parallel exploration, mandatory repository-agnostic risk-family coverage with dispatch scaled to diff size and risk, independent reviewer validation, critic challenge, and metrics writeback. Use for deep pull request review with low false-positive…