agent-eval

A command-line tool for comparing coding agents on the same software tasks. It records how often each agent succeeds, how much it costs, how long it takes, and how consistent its results are.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to define coding tasks in YAML, run agents against pinned versions of a repository, and judge their work with tests or file checks. It supports agent selection and regression checks.
Why use it?
It replaces informal opinions about which coding agent is best with repeatable results from your own codebase. It also helps detect performance changes after an agent or model update.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/23ag1/completely/agent-eval
Any agent
npx skills add 23ag1/completely --skill agent-eval
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/23ag1/completely

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 37 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,085 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 91% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00037 $0.01085
Opus 5 $0.00018 $0.00543
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00217
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00109

Measured 2d ago against content hash 200179d515f9, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

agent-eval scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

91% identical to agent-eval — 27 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

research/ecc/skills/agent-eval/SKILL.md · 146 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 146 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Agent Eval Skill

A lightweight CLI tool for comparing coding agents head-to-head on reproducible tasks. Every "which coding agent is best?" comparison runs on vibes — this tool systematizes it.

When to Activate

  • Comparing coding agents (Claude Code, Aider, Codex, etc.) on your own codebase
  • Measuring agent performance before adopting a new tool or model
  • Running regression checks when an agent updates its model or tooling
  • Producing data-backed agent selection decisions for a team

Installation

Note: Install agent-eval from its repository after reviewing the source.

Core Concepts

YAML Task Definitions

Define tasks declaratively. Each task specifies what to do, which files to touch, and how to judge success:

name: add-retry-logic
description: Add exponential backoff retry to the HTTP client
repo: ./my-project
files:
  - src/http_client.py
prompt: |
  Add retry logic with exponential backoff to all HTTP requests.
  Max 3 retries. Initial delay 1s, max delay 30s.
judge:
  - type: pytest
    command: pytest tests/test_http_client.py -v
  - type: grep
    pattern: "exponential_backoff|retry"
    files: src/http_client.py
commit: "abc1234"  # pin to specific commit for reproducibility

Git Worktree Isolation

Each agent run gets its own git worktree — no Docker required. This provides reproducibility isolation so agents cannot interfere with each other or corrupt the base repo.

Metrics Collected

Metric What It Measures
Pass rate Did the agent produce code that passes the judge?
Cost API spend per task (when available)
Time Wall-clock seconds to completion
Consistency Pass rate across repeated runs (e.g., 3/3 = 100%)

Workflow

1. Define Tasks

Create a tasks/ directory with YAML files, one per task:

mkdir tasks
# Write task definitions (see template above)

2. Run Agents

Execute agents against your tasks:

agent-eval run --task tasks/add-retry-logic.yaml --agent claude-code --agent aider --runs 3

Read the full file on GitHub · 146 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 146 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 200179d515f9

Subscribe to this mod's changes

agent-eval is a skill published in the GitHub repository 23ag1/completely (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,085 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to agent-eval, differing in 27 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories