completely:plan

A planning tool that breaks a feature or project into small tasks and stores the plan directly in Beads, a task-tracking system. It uses questions, alternatives, dependencies, worker instructions, and a checklist of outcomes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to plan a feature or project in Beads, create an epic and worker tasks, arrange dependency waves, and define how each task will be checked.
Why use it?
It turns a broad goal into ordered, testable work without requiring a separate planning file. It makes task ownership, required context, dependencies, and human review points explicit.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/23ag1/completely/plan
Any agent
npx skills add 23ag1/completely --skill plan
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/23ag1/completely

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 96 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 813 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00096 $0.00813
Opus 5 $0.00048 $0.00407
Sonnet 5 $0.00019 $0.00163
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00081

Measured 2d ago against content hash 865b48bdae39, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

completely:plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugin/skills/plan/SKILL.md · 41 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 41 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Plan into Beads directly. Do NOT write a PLAN.md / STATE.md — the plan lives in Beads.

Method (GSD methodology, Beads-first)

  1. Discover (socratic). Ask clarifying questions ONE at a time until the goal is unambiguous; offer 2–3 approaches with trade-offs; confirm scope. If a spec is already frozen, read it instead.
  2. Decompose into atomic tasks (2–5 min each). Each task MUST carry the worker-contract: title (imperative), acceptance (observable/testable), design (approach/why), write_zone (exact files/globs), verify (the proof command), deps (other task keys). ~2–3 tasks per unit; split if a unit exceeds ~5 tasks or ~10 files (context budget). Also fill the context fields — the engine consumes them directly:
    • read_context — the exact files/interfaces the worker must READ first but won't edit (contracts, schemas, neighbouring patterns). Injected verbatim into the worker's dispatch header, so a fresh context reads exactly this instead of guessing or scanning the tree.
    • must_haves — the goal-backward checklist {truths, artifacts, key_links} the default-FAIL evaluator grades against at VERIFY. No must_haves ⇒ the evaluator has only the acceptance line.
    • requirements — requirement IDs this task covers (traceability), when the phase has them.
  3. Checkpoints. Where a human must verify/decide, add {key,title,after,how}; make downstream tasks depend on cp:<key> so the wave blocks until the human closes it.
  4. Self-check (goal-backward, GSD plan-checker's 7 dimensions). Before applying, verify: requirement coverage · task completeness (acceptance+verify present) · dependencies acyclic · artifacts wired together (not isolated) · scope within context budget · acceptance is user-observable · honors the user's frozen decisions. Fix gaps — don't apply a plan that won't reach the goal.
  5. Apply. Emit the plan as JSON and pipe it to the materializer: cat <<'PLAN' | cmpl plan-applyPLAN. It creates the epic + tasks + deps + checkpoints + a bd swarm (native waves). Then show bd ready and bd swarm status.

Read the full file on GitHub · 41 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 41 lines · 96 tokens per session scan A 865b48bdae39

Subscribe to this mod's changes

completely:plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository 23ag1/completely (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 96 tokens to every session and 813 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories