Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add 44-pixels/handover-mcp --skill handover-test-continuitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/44-pixels/handover-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/44-pixels/handover-mcp/handover-test-continuity)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/44-pixels/handover-mcp/handover-test-continuity"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/44-pixels/handover-mcp/handover-test-continuity.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.01702 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00038 | $0.00851 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00340 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00170 |
Grade A, and why
handover-test-continuity scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 216 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Handover continuity
Prove that work survives a change of identity, host, review state, and revision. Do not report a continuity pass merely because the endpoint responded or a create call succeeded.
Distinguish the test layers
Report each layer separately:
- Connectivity: the host can reach Handover and list or call tools.
- Workflow completion: one authenticated actor publishes and reads back an immutable multi-file revision.
- Continuity: another authenticated actor reviews exact evidence, a later revision corrects it, and a fresh successor continues without the original chat.
Use handover-verify instead when the user only needs a read-only connection
or identity check.
Preconditions
Require:
- Principal A with read and write access;
- Principal B with read and annotation access;
- Principal C with read and write access, which may be Principal A;
- Principal D outside the workspace for the denied test;
- a dedicated test workspace or an explicit integration-test label; and
- permission to create harmless test data and revoke a test credential.
Grant each principal only the smallest role and workspace scope required for its checkpoint. The test must not use owner access where a member, reviewer, reader, or denied principal is the behavior under evaluation.
Use a unique marker such as:
e2e-mcp-handoff-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS
Never request, display, log, or publish credentials. Do not put hidden reasoning or unrelated personal data in artifacts.
If the required identities or permissions are unavailable, run only the provable subset and mark every skipped checkpoint. Do not widen access merely to make a test pass.
1. Verify the publisher
As Principal A:
- call
handover.whoami; - record the server-resolved principal, organization, workspace, role, and scopes;
- stop if any boundary is unexpected; and
- call
handover.searchfor the unique marker before creating.
Authorship comes from the accepted credential, never from a name supplied in the prompt.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 216 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A 853e0c874804
handover-test-continuity is a skill published in the GitHub repository 44-pixels/handover-mcp (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 1,702 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
uat-testing
Run end-to-end User Acceptance Tests for Agent Brain features. Builds wheels, installs packages, starts a test server, runs tests, and reports results — all without permission prompts.
atf-testing
Build ServiceNow Automated Test Framework tests and suites — impersonation, form steps, assertions, server-side script steps, test parameters, and execution via snowcreateatftest / snowexecuteatftest.
tabnexus-mcp-evals
Generate, validate, and run isolated Codex-to-TabNexus MCP evaluations with a curated 600-query dataset, executable gold tool labels, safety checks, and best-of-three stability scoring. Use when testing TabNexus MCP tool coverage, Agent behavior, regression quality, destructive-action safety, prompt changes, or a…
e2e-setup
Set up Playwright e2e automation tailored to this team and app. Probes the running app (auth mechanism, API surface, spec availability), interviews with recommendations instead of open questions, scaffolds the playwright/ folder, and records every decision in playwright/AUTOMATION.md for the other e2e skills to read.…
test-cases
Generate test cases from a Jira ticket's acceptance criteria. Produces e2e test scenarios (steps and expected results, no code) and a unit test checklist for developers. Test cases map back to requirements for traceability. Use when: "write test cases", "generate tests", "e2e tests for PROJ-789", "test cases for this…
verify-fix
Re-test a bug fix after a developer resolves it. Pulls the original bug from Jira, re-executes the repro steps in the browser, checks for regressions, and updates the bug status. The final step in the SDT workflow before a ticket moves to Done. Use when: "verify fix", "retest", "is this fixed?", "check BUG-123"…