Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add 45ck/skill-harness --skill gh-actions-failure-triagegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/45ck/skill-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/45ck/skill-harness/gh-actions-failure-triage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/45ck/skill-harness/gh-actions-failure-triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/45ck/skill-harness/gh-actions-failure-triage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/45ck/skill-harness/gh-actions-failure-triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/45ck/skill-harness/gh-actions-failure-triage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00208 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00104 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00042 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
gh-actions-failure-triage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Use this skill when CI is failing in GitHub Actions and the user wants the failure understood or fixed.
Process:
- identify the failing workflow, job, and step rather than saying only that CI is red
- pull the smallest useful failure snippet and the command or assertion that failed
- separate infrastructure noise from an actual code or test regression
- map the failure to the local file or behavior most likely responsible
- define the cheapest local verification before rerunning CI
Deliver:
- failing workflow and job
- short failure summary
- likely root-cause area
- proposed fix path
- exact verification steps to run locally first
Avoid:
- dumping huge logs without synthesis
- treating every failure as a code defect when the runner or external service is the real problem
- changing unrelated code just to make the pipeline go green
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 29 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 932f346aa559
gh-actions-failure-triage is a skill published in the GitHub repository 45ck/skill-harness (15 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 208 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
do-it-code-quality
Use when designing, changing, or debugging code to locate causal ownership and close the affected behavior.
gh-fix-ci
Use when a user asks to debug or fix failing GitHub PR checks that run in GitHub Actions; use gh to inspect checks and logs, summarize failure context, draft a fix plan, and implement only after explicit approval. Treat external providers (for example Buildkite) as out of scope and report only the details URL.
eve
Build durable backend AI agents with the eve framework. Use when creating, editing, or debugging an eve project — agent instructions, skills, tools, connections, channels, sandboxes, subagents, schedules, or evals.
bug-fixing
Fix defects in the Composio SDK repository with focused reproduction, root-cause analysis, regression tests, and narrow verification. Use when the user reports a bug, failing test, CI regression, runtime defect, or incorrect SDK behavior. Do not use for new feature design or broad refactors.
typescript-testing
Select and run TypeScript SDK verification for packages, examples, type checks, linting, builds, Vitest suites, and runtime E2E tests. Use when adding tests, diagnosing TypeScript CI, choosing a focused test command, or validating TypeScript package changes. Do not use for Python-only checks.
cli-e2e
Write, modify, or debug Docker-based Composio CLI end-to-end tests under ts/e2e-tests/cli, including binary invocation, fixture isolation, output assertions, and package manifests. Use for CLI E2E test suites only; use cli-command for CLI source implementation.