Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add 7xmohamed/Kata --skill huntgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/7xmohamed/KataWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/7xmohamed/kata/hunt)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/7xmohamed/kata/hunt"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/7xmohamed/kata/hunt/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/7xmohamed/kata/hunt"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/7xmohamed/kata/hunt.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.01892 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00757 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00378 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00189 |
Grade A, and why
hunt scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 145 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Hunt: Diagnose Before You Fix
Prefix your first line with ⚔️ inline, not as its own paragraph.
A patch applied to a symptom creates a new bug somewhere else.
Do not touch code until you can state the root cause in one sentence:
"I believe the root cause is [X] because [evidence]."
Name a specific file, function, line, or condition. "A state management issue" is not testable. "Stale cache in useUser at src/hooks/user.ts:42 because the dependency array is missing userId" is testable. If you cannot be that specific, you do not have a hypothesis yet.
Rationalization Watch
When these surface, stop and re-examine:
| What you're thinking | What it actually means | Rule |
|---|---|---|
| "I'll just try this one thing" | No hypothesis, random-walking | Stop. Write the hypothesis first. |
| "I'm confident it's X" | Confidence is not evidence | Run an instrument that proves it. |
| "Probably the same issue as before" | Treating a new symptom as a known pattern | Re-read the execution path from scratch. |
| "It works on my machine" | Environment difference IS the bug | Enumerate every env difference before dismissing. |
| "One more restart should fix it" | Avoiding the error message | Read the last error verbatim. Never restart more than twice without new evidence. |
Progress Signals
When these appear, the diagnosis is moving in the right direction:
| What you're thinking | What it means | Next step |
|---|---|---|
| "This log line matches the hypothesis" | Positive evidence found | Find one more independent piece of evidence to cross-validate |
| "I can predict what the next error will be" | Mental model is forming | Run the prediction; if it matches, the model is correct |
| "Root cause is in A but symptoms appear in B" | Propagation path understood | Trace the call chain from A to B and confirm each link |
| "I can write a test that would fail on the old code" | Hypothesis is specific and testable | Write the test before applying the fix |
Do not claim progress without observable evidence matching at least one of these signals.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 145 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 1b3ccc33c806
hunt is a skill published in the GitHub repository 7xmohamed/Kata (1 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 1,892 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
verification-and-release
Design risk-based verification and judge release readiness from traceable evidence. Use when deciding what must be proven or whether an integrated change can ship.
product-design-director
Define product UX and visual direction from user goals, brand evidence, states, responsiveness, and accessibility. Use when the main question is what the experience should communicate or feel like.
screenshot-to-interface
Reconstruct a maintainable interface from screenshots or visual references. Use when fidelity to supplied visual evidence is the primary requirement.
health
Audits agent config, instruction drift, hooks or MCP, and AI maintainability. Use when Claude, Codex, or Pi setup looks wrong. Not for application bugs or PR review.
hunt
Finds root cause before any fix. Use when something errors, crashes, regresses, or used to work. Not for code review or new features.
adk-go-self-review
Review an ADK Go change the way a maintainer will — a fresh-context pass over the whole diff, five lenses (correctness and tests, scope, simplicity, style, adk-python parity), and the mutation check that proves your tests pin the change. Use before opening a PR, before any later push that changes code, and when asked…