Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add a-pavithraa/springboot-skills-marketplace --skill code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/a-pavithraa/springboot-skills-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/a-pavithraa/springboot-skills-marketplace/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/a-pavithraa/springboot-skills-marketplace/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/a-pavithraa/springboot-skills-marketplace/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/a-pavithraa/springboot-skills-marketplace/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/a-pavithraa/springboot-skills-marketplace/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00105 | $0.01532 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00042 | $0.00613 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00306 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00153 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 111 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spring Boot 4 Reviewer (Java 17+)
Rules
- If the repository has a
REVIEW.mdat its root, read it first. Check the change against each rule it lists, and follow what it says to report and skip. - Review only code you have. If no files, diff, or module were given, ask for them.
- Cite a file path and line for every finding. Mark findings in code the change didn't touch as pre-existing.
- Read the Java version from
pom.xmlorbuild.gradle. Boot 4 supports Java 17 and later, so Java 17 and 21 are not findings. Java 26 and 27 targets:../creating-springboot-projects/references/java-version-policy.md. - Recommend virtual threads, reactive code, or a new architecture only with evidence from the code: blocking I/O on request threads, a saturated pool, or a boundary that already leaks.
- Use JSpecify as the null-safety baseline for new Boot 4 code. If the codebase is part way through moving to it, report the plan, not every legacy annotation.
Before Step 1: say who wrote the code
If you wrote or changed the code under review in this session, tell the user that a review from a fresh context is less biased and offer to run it in a general-purpose subagent, giving it the commits and uncommitted changes to review and telling it to follow this skill (code-reviewer). Continue only if they decline. Otherwise, review inline.
Step 1: Load only the references the review needs
| Focus | Read |
|---|---|
| Spring Boot 4 migration patterns and framework changes | references/spring-boot-4-patterns.md |
| Java 25 language and concurrency adoption | references/java-25-features.md |
| Security | references/security-checklist.md |
| Performance | references/performance-patterns.md |
| JPA and Hibernate 7 | references/jpa-performance.md |
| Architecture boundaries and packaging | references/architecture-patterns.md |
| Domain model shape | references/domain-modeling.md, references/value-objects-patterns.md |
| Null safety | references/jspecify-null-safety.md |
| Tests: what they can catch, what they let through | references/test-review.md |
What ships with it
12 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/architecture-patterns.md 7.4 KB
- references/domain-modeling.md 3.6 KB
- references/java-25-features.md 8.9 KB
- references/jpa-performance.md 8.0 KB
- references/jspecify-null-safety.md 4.6 KB
- references/performance-patterns.md 16 KB
- references/security-checklist.md 12 KB
- references/spring-boot-4-patterns.md 8.5 KB
- references/test-review.md 5.0 KB
- references/testing/boot4-test-toolkit.md 4.9 KB
- references/testing/traps.md 8.5 KB
- references/value-objects-patterns.md 6.8 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · +1 lines e0b4dd77f42f
- 2d ago Changed · -11 tokens per session 6c8f54dd4fa9
- 3d ago Changed · +13 lines a70e9817ce3a
- 4d ago Changed · -91 lines · +34 tokens per session e7f394dd5a6f
- 1mo ago First seen · 188 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A cc3c5456ecfa
code-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository a-pavithraa/springboot-skills-marketplace (80 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 105 tokens to every session and 1,532 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
understand-diff
Use when you need to analyze git diffs or pull requests to understand what changed, affected components, and risks.
auto-test-code
A structured process for critically reviewing and testing software code. It records review findings, test plans, commands, results, and supporting files in a project workspace.
git-pr-review
A read-only reviewer for GitHub pull requests, which are proposed code changes submitted for review. It produces an evidence-based report about whether a pull request should be merged.
review
Plan-aware graph-enhanced code review before merge. CRITICAL issues block merge. Use after fix/verify.
flutter-dart-code-review
Library-agnostic Flutter/Dart code review checklist covering widget best practices, state management patterns (BLoC, Riverpod, Provider, GetX, MobX, Signals), Dart idioms, performance, accessibility, security, and clean architecture.
code-reviewer
A code-review workflow that checks completed work against its requirements or plan before merging. It groups findings by severity and gives each issue a fix and a way to verify it.