Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add a252937166/proofline --skill proofline-match-verifiergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/a252937166/prooflineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/a252937166/proofline/proofline-match-verifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/a252937166/proofline/proofline-match-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/a252937166/proofline/proofline-match-verifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/a252937166/proofline/proofline-match-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/a252937166/proofline/proofline-match-verifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.01746 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00873 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00349 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00175 |
Grade A, and why
proofline-match-verifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 153 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Proofline Match Verifier
Use the Proofline MCP tools to produce an evidence-backed conclusion. Preserve the API's exact match/event identifiers, disclosure, source links, evidence score, conflicts, hashes, and transaction links.
Non-negotiable truth labels
- Read
modeanddisclosurebefore describing any match data. - Say Historical Replay · Not Live for replay data. A replay can exercise the real verifier and contract path, but it is never a current match feed.
- Say Scheduled · No Events Yet for a future fixture, and Delayed Snapshot · Not Live for a captured provider result. Do not infer a live feed from the tournament year.
- Say Live only when the API explicitly reports live mode and current provider provenance. Do not infer live status from a clock animation, recent timestamp, or a match status.
- Identify synthetic fault-injection observations as synthetic. They test conflict handling and are not historical claims.
- An Injective transaction proves that a hash was committed at a time. It does not make the underlying score or event true. Truth quality comes from source provenance, independent agreement, and conflict handling.
- A demo receipt or sandbox x402 signature is not a token transfer or public chain transaction. Carry its demo disclosure into the answer.
Verification workflow
Use the Proofline MCP for match evidence and policy decisions. Use the official
InjectiveLabs/mcp-server for Injective address, native USDC, balance, CCTP
status, or raw EVM operations. Record the actual tool name, redacted input
summary, success/failure, duration, and result hash for every call; a UI-derived
illustration is never an execution log.
Follow these steps in order:
- Call
list_matches, thenget_matchfor the chosen match. - Call
get_match_events; retain its machine-readabledataMode, timestamps, provider payload hashes, adapter version, and disclosure. - Select the exact event ID. Call
verify_eventand inspect all active observations, independence groups, conflicts, evidence-score breakdown, and canonical event hash. - Call
assess_settlement_readinessbefore any result-level conclusion. - If free evidence is sufficient, stop. Do not buy a report just because a paid tool exists.
- If a complete signed proof packet is necessary and paid access is authorized,
call
quote_match_proof. Check the payment policy below before callingpurchase_match_proof. - Pass the purchased packet to
verify_proof_packet. Require three separate results: packet integrity, EIP-712 issuer signature, and on-chain commitment. A self-consistent packet without a valid configured issuer is not trusted. - If the packet claims a real testnet anchor, call
verify_onchain_anchorwith its match ID, event hash, and evidence root. Compare the fresh chain result, chain ID, registry address, match-wide latest revision, decision state, and packet receipt. Settlement must useverifyLatestSettlementProof; a successfulverifyHistoricalProofonly proves that an older revision once existed. Never treat a transaction URL or packet recomputation alone as a live chain read. - Return one of:
VERIFIED FOR DISPLAY,READY FOR SETTLEMENT,HELD, orINCONCLUSIVE, followed by concise reasons and evidence links.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 153 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A c0b1f84bcc95
proofline-match-verifier is a skill published in the GitHub repository a252937166/proofline (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 1,746 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
worldcup-linelock
Buy and audit World Cup betting edges from LineLock over Injective x402. Use when the user wants the next knockout pick (model probability vs market odds + a conviction staking ladder), wants to pay per-call in USDC without an API key, or wants to audit a tipster's settled record by closing-line value (CLV). Handles…
cuporacle
Use CupOracle to answer FIFA World Cup 2026 questions (fixtures, live scores, consensus odds, knockout bracket) and to buy a vetted, CLV-audited edge that the agent pays for ITSELF via x402 on Injective — under a spend cap, always citing the on-chain receipt. Invoke when the user asks about a World Cup match, "who's…
image-prompting
Use when generating or editing images via blockrunimage — especially with GPT Image 2, Nano Banana, or Grok Imagine for posters, UI mockups, marketing assets, product shots, or anything with on-image text. Turns vague user requests ("make me a cool poster") into structured, text-accurate prompts that actually render…
surf
Use when the user wants crypto data — token prices, on-chain SQL, prediction-market positions, CEX order books, wallet labels/net-worth, social mindshare, news, or unified search. 83 endpoints across exchange, on-chain, wallet, social, prediction, news and search — one API, flat $0.0085/call in USDC via x402. Settles…
blockrun
Pay-per-call access to AI models, real-time data, media generation and multi-chain RPC over x402 micropayments (USDC on Base or Solana). No API keys, no accounts, no subscriptions. Start here when you have the BlockRun MCP installed and need to know WHICH tool answers a question, how the wallet works, or how to make a…
gentech-blockrun
GenTech Labs' integration patterns for BlockRun MCP from Hermes Agent. Covers daily usage patterns, cost-optimized workflows, multi-tool pipelines, and reliable error handling for BlockRun's full toolset.