Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team --skill agent-networkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-TeamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaaaqwq/agi-super-team/agent-network)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaaaqwq/agi-super-team/agent-network"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aaaaqwq/agi-super-team/agent-network.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.01935 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00967 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00387 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00194 |
Grade A, and why
agent-network scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 312 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent Network - Multi-Agent Collaboration System
A complete multi-agent group chat and collaboration platform that allows AI agents to communicate, coordinate, and collaborate in a structured environment similar to enterprise chat platforms like DingTalk or Lark.
What This Skill Provides
- Group Chat System - Multiple agents can chat in groups with message history
- @Mentions - Agents can @mention each other to trigger notifications
- Task Management - Create, assign, track, and complete tasks
- Decision Voting - Propose decisions and vote (for/against/abstain)
- Inbox Notifications - Unread message tracking and notification center
- Online Status - Real-time agent online/offline status
- Central Coordinator - Message routing and agent lifecycle management
Quick Start
from agent_network import AgentManager, GroupManager, MessageManager, TaskManager, DecisionManager, get_coordinator
# Initialize default agents
from agent_network import init_default_agents
init_default_agents()
# Get the coordinator
coordinator = get_coordinator()
# Register agents
coordinator.register_agent(agent_id=1)
coordinator.register_agent(agent_id=2)
# Create a group
group = GroupManager.create("Dev Team", owner_id=1, description="Development team chat")
GroupManager.add_member(group.id, agent_id=2)
# Send a message with @mention
MessageManager.send_message(
from_agent_id=1,
content="@小邢 Please check the server status",
group_id=group.id
)
# Assign a task
task = TaskManager.create(
title="Fix login bug",
assigner_id=1,
assignee_id=2,
description="Users can't login with SSO",
priority="high"
)
# Create a decision
decision = DecisionManager.create(
title="Adopt new database?",
description="Should we migrate to distributed database?",
proposer_id=1,
group_id=group.id
)
# Vote on decision
DecisionManager.vote(decision.id, agent_id=2, vote="for", comment="Agreed, better performance")
Core Components
What ships with it
14 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- _meta.json 132 B
- .clawhub/origin.json 145 B
- references/ADVANCED.md 11 KB
- references/schema.sql 5.8 KB
- scripts/agent_network/__init__.py 1.9 KB runs code
- scripts/agent_network/agent_manager.py 4.8 KB runs code
- scripts/agent_network/coordinator.py 13 KB runs code
- scripts/agent_network/database.py 3.3 KB runs code
- scripts/agent_network/decision_manager.py 13 KB runs code
- scripts/agent_network/group_manager.py 8.0 KB runs code
- scripts/agent_network/message_manager.py 12 KB runs code
- scripts/agent_network/task_manager.py 13 KB runs code
- scripts/cli.py 21 KB runs code
- scripts/demo.py 13 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 312 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A bece56d89ad6
agent-network is a skill published in the GitHub repository aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team (91 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 1,935 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
deslop
The optimization pass, defined - delete before you add, one smell class per pass, behaviour pinned by a test that ran BEFORE the edit. Lints a SKILL.md and prose by the same instinct. Use for the per-story optimization pass or when code has grown noisy without growing capable.
root-cause
Find the mechanism behind a failure instead of patching its symptom - reproduce first, one variable per experiment with the prediction written before the run, exit by naming the mechanism and pinning it with a failing test. Use for a bug, an unexplained red test, or a failure that will not reproduce.
guidance
Add, edit, or audit guidance docs. Default writes guidance for Claude (.claude/guidance/, Markdown, moflo universal rules). -h writes for human readers (docs/, lighter ruleset). --html emits HTML with a minimal default stylesheet instead of Markdown. -a audits the .claude/guidance/ directory.
eldar
Consult the Eldar — audit a project's moflo + Claude Code setup for portable, high-leverage gaps and guide remediation. Default mode is read-only audit with severity-ranked findings; --fix presents an interactive triage menu and walks the user through each chosen fix (healer, missing CLAUDE.md, sparse guidance…
aigon-next
Suggest the most likely next workflow action based on current context.
review-deep
Drive the deep-review phase of an automated PR review. Consumes the walkthrough, runs the deterministic deep-review workflow (parallel lenses → adversarial validation → code-enforced threshold/caps), drafts the surviving findings, and completes the review run.