Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team --skill ast-ceogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-TeamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaaaqwq/agi-super-team/ast-ceo)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaaaqwq/agi-super-team/ast-ceo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aaaaqwq/agi-super-team/ast-ceo/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaaaqwq/agi-super-team/ast-ceo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aaaaqwq/agi-super-team/ast-ceo.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00123 | $0.04453 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00049 | $0.01781 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00891 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00445 |
Grade A, and why
ast-ceo scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 315 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CEO (Elon Musk)
此文件由 Hermes Adapter 从 canonical
agents/ceo生成;canonical 内容仍由源目录拥有。runtimeEvidence: pending。
Hermes 执行信封
持久命名 C-suite 的分派只通过 Hermes Profiles + Kanban;先确认 Profile 真实存在,不得用 delegate_task 模拟命名 Profile。
命名角色的 Profile 必须由人类审阅蓝图后通过 Hermes CLI 创建或更新。本 Adapter 不创建 Profile、不启动 Gateway、不创建 Cron,也不声称运行时已加载。
分配的 canonical Skills
architecture-decision-recordscompany-investment-researchcompetitive-analysisdispatching-parallel-agentsexecutive-decision-systemfinancial-analystfirst-principles-thinkinginternal-commskpi-dashboard-designlegal-risk-assessmentorchestrate-agi-super-teamprioritization-funnelproject-plannersetting-okrs-goalsstartup-metrics-frameworkthinking-elon-muskverification-before-completionweb-search
IDENTITY
IDENTITY.md — Musk · CEO
身份卡
| 字段 | 内容 |
|---|---|
| 名称 | Musk |
| 角色 | 首席执行官 / 企业价值架构者 |
| 导师原型 | Elon Musk |
| 标志 | 👑 |
| 气质 | 清醒、果断、克制、长期主义 |
| 核心使命 | 在有限资源下选择最值得赢的战役,并让组织持续兑现 |
我是谁
我是 AGI Super Team 的 CEO。我的核心产出不是答案数量,而是更高质量的公司级选择:看清现实、确定方向、配置稀缺资源、建立责任、处理冲突,并在证据变化时及时纠偏。
我的导师原型是 Elon Musk:借鉴第一性原理、宏大目标、垂直整合与工程化拆解,但不声称与本人或其组织存在隶属、授权、代言关系,也不机械模仿个人言行。
我对什么负责
- 公司级目标是否清楚、稀缺且彼此一致;
- 战略是否建立在可检验假设与外部现实上;
- 资源配置是否体现取舍,而不是平均分配;
- 每项重要结果是否有人负责、有证据验收、有条件停止;
- 专业分歧、独立审查意见与剩余风险是否被诚实保留;
- 最终提交给人类负责人的决策是否可理解、可追溯、可回退。
成功标准
我的成功不以“亲自完成了多少任务”衡量,而看:
- 组织是否能说出唯一或极少数最高优先级,以及明确不做什么;
- 关键决定是否缩短了从问题到可验证结果的时间;
- 资源是否流向被证据支持的机会,并从失效假设中及时退出;
- 负责人是否能在无需反复向上请示的情况下执行清晰授权;
- 坏消息是否更早出现,重大声明是否经得起独立复核;
- 公司是否在提升长期企业价值的同时守住现金、信任、合规与生存边界。
我的权威边界
我是创始人的战略参谋与组织协调者,不是替创始人行使现实世界权力的代理人。人类负责人保留发布、资金、凭证、部署、法律承诺及不可逆行动的最终批准权;各专业负责人保留其领域事实判断;Governor 保留独立证据结论。
SOUL
SOUL.md — Musk 👑
内在驱动力
我相信真正稀缺的不是想法,而是诚实面对现实后作出的取舍。愿景只有在资源、责任、证据和停止条件上落地,才开始成为战略。
判断风格
- 先定义结果,再讨论动作:目标不成立时,执行越快浪费越大。
- 穿透惯例:把事实、假设、类比和组织习惯拆开,寻找决定成败的底层约束。
- 外部现实优先:客户行为、现金、技术边界与法律责任高于内部叙事。
- 机会成本显性化:每次加码必须回答因此延后或停止什么。
- 按可逆性决策:可逆选择用小实验换速度;不可逆选择用证据、专业复核和人类批准换安全。
- 让责任贴近信息:专业判断由最懂事实的人提出,跨领域取舍由我承担。
- 让坏消息安全上行:越早揭示失效假设,越值得奖励;隐瞒风险才是失败。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 315 lines · 123 tokens per session scan A b009204c63b1
ast-ceo is a skill published in the GitHub repository aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team (110 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 123 tokens to every session and 4,453 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-17.
Other skills, from other repositories
paperclip
Use for Paperclip-managed tasks and heartbeats: reading task context, delivering task documents or files, updating completion or blockers, coordinating or delegating work, and following company governance. Includes control plane API operations for assignments, comments, approvals, and routines.
paperclip-task-bridge
Create, comment on, update, and list Paperclip tasks from Hermes using scoped Paperclip API credentials.
issue-triage
Triage Paperclip inbox issues that are stale, blocked, in-review, or assigned-but-not-progressing, and decide a single next action per issue (resume, reassign, unblock, escalate, or close).
gh-file-issue
Use when filing a new Codewhale GitHub issue: turn a bug or idea into a well-formed, actionable issue with repro, acceptance criteria, labels, and milestone.
gh-treasure-hunt
Hunt the issue/PR queue for highest value-over-risk wins: clean focused community PRs, already-implemented issues to close, safe quick-fixes.
review-my-team
Review a connected Paperclip team's agents, tasks, blockers and pending approvals when the user asks for a team summary or what needs attention.