Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team --skill change-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-TeamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaaaqwq/agi-super-team/change-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaaaqwq/agi-super-team/change-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aaaaqwq/agi-super-team/change-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaaaqwq/agi-super-team/change-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aaaaqwq/agi-super-team/change-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.01430 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00715 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00286 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00143 |
Grade A, and why
change-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 199 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Change Review
Review of CRM and PM data changes before PR -- a data equivalent of code-review
Public repository: https://github.com/your-org/claude-change-review-skill
When to use
- Before a PR with CRM changes
- Before a PR with PM changes (tasks, projects)
- "check my CRM changes"
- "change review"
- "data review"
Paths
| What | Path |
|---|---|
| CRM | $CRM_PATH/ |
| CRM Schema | $CRM_PATH/schema.yaml |
| PM | $PM_PATH/ |
How to execute
Step 1: Read schema.yaml
# ALWAYS read the schema first -- it contains all the rules
cat $CRM_PATH/schema.yaml
Schema contains:
primary_key-- unique identifierrequired-- required fieldsunique-- unique fieldsforeign_keys-- relationships between tablescomposite_unique-- composite unique keysenums-- allowed valuesid_format-- regex for ID formatrules-- business rules
Step 2: Get the diff
git diff HEAD -- sales/crm/
Step 3: Load data
import pandas as pd
import yaml
# Read schema
with open('$CRM_PATH/schema.yaml') as f:
schema = yaml.safe_load(f)
# Load all tables
base_path = '$CRM_PATH/'
tables = {}
for table_name, table_def in schema['tables'].items():
tables[table_name] = pd.read_csv(base_path + table_def['file'])
Step 4: Validate against schema
import re
def validate_table(name, df, table_schema, all_tables):
issues = []
# 1. Primary key uniqueness
pk = table_schema['primary_key']
if df[pk].duplicated().any():
dups = df[df[pk].duplicated()][pk].tolist()
issues.append(('critical', f'Duplicate {pk}: {dups}'))
# 2. Required fields
for field in table_schema.get('required', []):
missing = df[df[field].isna()]
if len(missing) > 0:
issues.append(('critical', f'Missing required {field}: {len(missing)} rows'))
# 3. Unique fields
for field in table_schema.get('unique', []):
if field == pk:
continue
dups = df[df[field].notna() & df[field].duplicated()]
if len(dups) > 0:
issues.append(('high', f'Duplicate {field}: {dups[field].tolist()}'))
# 4. Foreign keys
for fk_field, ref in table_schema.get('foreign_keys', {}).items():
ref_table, ref_field = ref.split('.')
valid_values = all_tables[ref_table][ref_field]
invalid = df[df[fk_field].notna() & ~df[fk_field].isin(valid_values)]
if len(invalid) > 0:
issues.append(('critical', f'Invalid {fk_field} references: {invalid[fk_field].tolist()}'))
# 5. Composite unique
for fields in table_schema.get('composite_unique', []):
dups = df[df.duplicated(subset=fields, keep=False)]
if len(dups) > 0:
issues.append(('critical', f'Duplicate {"+".join(fields)} combination'))
# 6. Enum values
for field, valid_values in table_schema.get('enums', {}).items():
invalid = df[df[field].notna() & ~df[field].isin(valid_values)]
if len(invalid) > 0:
issues.append(('high', f'Invalid {field} values: {invalid[field].unique().tolist()}'))
# 7. ID format
if 'id_format' in table_schema:
pattern = table_schema['id_format']
invalid = df[~df[pk].str.match(pattern, na=False)]
if len(invalid) > 0:
issues.append(('low', f'Invalid ID format: {invalid[pk].tolist()}'))
return issues
# Validate all tables
for name, table_schema in schema['tables'].items():
if name in tables:
issues = validate_table(name, tables[name], table_schema, tables)
for severity, msg in issues:
print(f'[{severity.upper()}] {name}: {msg}')
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 199 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 1e59a7ec30fc
change-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team (91 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 1,430 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
issue-creation
Trigger: issue creation, bug reports, feature requests, or issue approval. Create and triage GitHub issues from repository evidence.
sdd-tasks
Break an SDD change into implementation tasks. Trigger: orchestrator launches task planning for a change.
mission-control
Interact with Mission Control — AI agent orchestration dashboard. Use when registering agents, managing tasks, syncing skills, or querying agent/task status via MC APIs.
systemic-issue-triage
Trigger: new issue, bug report, triage, backlog, issue flood, community report, root cause, dead-end, blocked user. Attack issues by root class, never one-by-one; fixes must shrink the system, not grow it.
feature-dev
Guide a feature implementation through a structured seven-phase workflow with deep codebase understanding, clarifying questions, parallel architecture design, and quality review. Use this skill when the user asks to build a new feature, add functionality, or wants a methodical approach to implementation rather than…
ln-51-opportunity-evaluator
Evaluates new product opportunities using demand, channels, competition, and economics. Not for committed-backlog or implementation planning.