Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team --skill change-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-TeamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaaaqwq/agi-super-team/change-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaaaqwq/agi-super-team/change-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aaaaqwq/agi-super-team/change-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaaaqwq/agi-super-team/change-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aaaaqwq/agi-super-team/change-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.01430 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00572 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00286 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00143 |
Grade A, and why
change-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 199 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Change Review
Review of CRM and PM data changes before PR -- a data equivalent of code-review
Public repository: https://github.com/your-org/claude-change-review-skill
When to use
- Before a PR with CRM changes
- Before a PR with PM changes (tasks, projects)
- "check my CRM changes"
- "change review"
- "data review"
Paths
| What | Path |
|---|---|
| CRM | $CRM_PATH/ |
| CRM Schema | $CRM_PATH/schema.yaml |
| PM | $PM_PATH/ |
How to execute
Step 1: Read schema.yaml
# ALWAYS read the schema first -- it contains all the rules
cat $CRM_PATH/schema.yaml
Schema contains:
primary_key-- unique identifierrequired-- required fieldsunique-- unique fieldsforeign_keys-- relationships between tablescomposite_unique-- composite unique keysenums-- allowed valuesid_format-- regex for ID formatrules-- business rules
Step 2: Get the diff
git diff HEAD -- sales/crm/
Step 3: Load data
import pandas as pd
import yaml
# Read schema
with open('$CRM_PATH/schema.yaml') as f:
schema = yaml.safe_load(f)
# Load all tables
base_path = '$CRM_PATH/'
tables = {}
for table_name, table_def in schema['tables'].items():
tables[table_name] = pd.read_csv(base_path + table_def['file'])
Step 4: Validate against schema
import re
def validate_table(name, df, table_schema, all_tables):
issues = []
# 1. Primary key uniqueness
pk = table_schema['primary_key']
if df[pk].duplicated().any():
dups = df[df[pk].duplicated()][pk].tolist()
issues.append(('critical', f'Duplicate {pk}: {dups}'))
# 2. Required fields
for field in table_schema.get('required', []):
missing = df[df[field].isna()]
if len(missing) > 0:
issues.append(('critical', f'Missing required {field}: {len(missing)} rows'))
# 3. Unique fields
for field in table_schema.get('unique', []):
if field == pk:
continue
dups = df[df[field].notna() & df[field].duplicated()]
if len(dups) > 0:
issues.append(('high', f'Duplicate {field}: {dups[field].tolist()}'))
# 4. Foreign keys
for fk_field, ref in table_schema.get('foreign_keys', {}).items():
ref_table, ref_field = ref.split('.')
valid_values = all_tables[ref_table][ref_field]
invalid = df[df[fk_field].notna() & ~df[fk_field].isin(valid_values)]
if len(invalid) > 0:
issues.append(('critical', f'Invalid {fk_field} references: {invalid[fk_field].tolist()}'))
# 5. Composite unique
for fields in table_schema.get('composite_unique', []):
dups = df[df.duplicated(subset=fields, keep=False)]
if len(dups) > 0:
issues.append(('critical', f'Duplicate {"+".join(fields)} combination'))
# 6. Enum values
for field, valid_values in table_schema.get('enums', {}).items():
invalid = df[df[field].notna() & ~df[field].isin(valid_values)]
if len(invalid) > 0:
issues.append(('high', f'Invalid {field} values: {invalid[field].unique().tolist()}'))
# 7. ID format
if 'id_format' in table_schema:
pattern = table_schema['id_format']
invalid = df[~df[pk].str.match(pattern, na=False)]
if len(invalid) > 0:
issues.append(('low', f'Invalid ID format: {invalid[pk].tolist()}'))
return issues
# Validate all tables
for name, table_schema in schema['tables'].items():
if name in tables:
issues = validate_table(name, tables[name], table_schema, tables)
for severity, msg in issues:
print(f'[{severity.upper()}] {name}: {msg}')
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 199 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 1e59a7ec30fc
change-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team (112 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 1,430 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
kandev-step-decision
Record the current workflow step decision through the task-bound Office CLI.
project-skill-review
Review the skills stored for a project. Read the project specifications and the skill usage statistics. Classify each enabled skill as Keep, Disable, Protected, or Unsure. Classify each disabled skill as Enable or Stay disabled. Propose source bundles, source disables, and a skill sync. Apply a change only after the…
harness-audit-engine
Use when running the shared drift-detection logic that backs /harness-audit and /harness-sync — produces a structured drift report covering convention files, ONBOARDING.md, snapshot staleness, constraint regressions, recurring reflection patterns, and HARNESS.md Status section accuracy.
harness-onboarding
Use when generating a human-readable onboarding document from HARNESS.md, AGENTS.md, and REFLECTIONLOG.md — produces a friendly guide for new team members joining a harnessed project.
team-api
Use when the user wants to create or update a Team Topologies Team API document with AI literacy portfolio assessment data — generates a template Team API with literacy levels, discipline scores, shared gaps, and improvement plans, or updates an existing Team API with the latest assessment data.
governance-observability
Use when defining governance metrics, reading governance health snapshots, generating the governance dashboard, or understanding the governance data model. Referenced by the governance-auditor agent and the /governance-health command.