Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aaronartistzhang-afk/DailyWork --skill group-discussion-reviewer-methodologygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aaronartistzhang-afk/DailyWorkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaronartistzhang-afk/dailywork/group-discussion-reviewer-methodology)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaronartistzhang-afk/dailywork/group-discussion-reviewer-methodology"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aaronartistzhang-afk/dailywork/group-discussion-reviewer-methodology/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaronartistzhang-afk/dailywork/group-discussion-reviewer-methodology"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aaronartistzhang-afk/dailywork/group-discussion-reviewer-methodology.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00203 | $0.00753 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00102 | $0.00377 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00151 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
group-discussion-reviewer-methodology scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 43 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Group Discussion Reviewer — methodology (no key, inline)
Apply a disciplined product group-discussion review to a PRD directly in the conversation. No API key, no Node, no code execution — you (the agent) perform the review by following the written methodology.
This is the lightweight sibling of the
group-discussion-reviewerengine skill. The engine runs the same pipeline deterministically (and gates P0s with code) but needs an OpenAI-compatible key. Prefer the engine when a key is available and fidelity matters; use this methodology skill when there's no key, or for a quick framework-driven review.Honest limitation: without the engine's deterministic P0 gatekeeper, the strictness of P0 downgrading depends on your judgment. Hold the P0 bar hard.
How to use
- Get the PRD body as text/markdown (this skill does not fetch URLs or expand sheets).
- Read
methodology.mdin this folder and execute its 8 phases in order. - Produce exactly the output contract:
## 组内准入,## 模拟评审结果,## P0 Blockers,## P1 Questions,## P2 Questions,## P1/P2 Improvement Suggestions. - Respect the mode the user asks for (standard / deep / challenge; default challenge) and the language (default Chinese).
The core discipline (summary — full detail in methodology.md)
- Two independent axes: 组内准入 (is it concrete enough to discuss?) vs 模拟评审结果 (would it pass?). A PRD can be admitted and still 不通过.
- P0 only for four failures: wrong direction/population, unmeasurable success (for a formal decision), unsafe launch, or non-viable delivery — each with a concrete product bridge. Everything else (stats audit, SLA/QPS/monitoring, tracking schema, release checklist, compliance checklist, naming/icons, missing sections) defaults to P1/P2.
- A clean PRD has 0 P0. Don't inflate P0 to fill a quota.
- Blind review: PRD body only; ignore comments/annotations/post-meeting context. Ask questions, don't answer them — except every P0 must include a concrete revision.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 43 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 575e25bd009c
group-discussion-reviewer-methodology is a skill published in the GitHub repository aaronartistzhang-afk/DailyWork (1 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 203 tokens to every session and 753 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
create-custom-grader
Use when converting an existing benchmark, rubric, verifier, task YAML/JSON, or domain check into SkillEvaluator BYOG/BYOT custom evaluation.
ab-test-generator
Generate A/B test variants for affiliate content. Triggers on: "create A/B test", "test my headline", "optimize my CTA", "generate variants", "split test ideas", "improve click-through rate", "test my landing page copy", "headline alternatives", "CTA variations", "which version is better", "optimize conversions"…
authoring-ci-workflows
Use when adding or editing a GitHub Actions workflow, composite action, or reusable workflow under .github/ — new CI jobs, triggers, matrices, checkout/clone tuning, action pinning, GitHub App token auth, concurrency groups, timeout-minutes, paths filters, caching, or runner choice. Covers PostHog's workflow-authoring…
debugging-mcp-analytics
Debug, support, and build PostHog MCP Analytics — product analytics for MCP servers (the @posthog/mcp and posthog.mcp SDKs plus the mcpanalytics product). Use when MCP analytics data looks wrong or missing ("events aren't showing", "intent clusters are empty", "sessions are missing", "per-tool numbers look wrong")…
debugging-ci-failures
Debugs failing GitHub Actions CI runs for PostHog PRs, commits, and branches, and answers broad CI-health questions ("is CI red?", "is master green today?", "what's broken right now?"). Use when the user asks why CI is red, asks for the current CI or master status, or mentions a failing check, GitHub Actions run…
monitoring-capture-service
Guide for using the Grafana MCP to monitor and diagnose the capture service (rust/capture) in production. Use when investigating latency, event loss, Kafka backpressure, Redis issues, rate limiting, Envoy proxy issues, or any capture health question. Covers prod-us and prod-eu environments.