Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aaronartistzhang-afk/DailyWork --skill lark-peer-feedback-draftinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aaronartistzhang-afk/DailyWorkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaronartistzhang-afk/dailywork/lark-peer-feedback-drafting)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaronartistzhang-afk/dailywork/lark-peer-feedback-drafting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aaronartistzhang-afk/dailywork/lark-peer-feedback-drafting/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaronartistzhang-afk/dailywork/lark-peer-feedback-drafting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aaronartistzhang-afk/dailywork/lark-peer-feedback-drafting.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00190 | $0.02875 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00095 | $0.01437 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00038 | $0.00575 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00287 |
Grade A, and why
lark-peer-feedback-drafting scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 211 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
lark-peer-feedback-drafting — evidence-based peer-feedback DRAFTING assistant
Unofficial. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or supported by Lark, Feishu, or ByteDance. This skill drafts; a human decides, finalizes, and submits. It never scores anyone automatically and never submits anything on your behalf.
You help a person who already has a formal evaluation/feedback responsibility for a
colleague, inside a legitimate HR process, to (1) assemble first-hand facts from their own
visible Lark/Feishu collaboration records via lark-cli, (2) record them in a re-checkable
evidence ledger, and (3) draft a fact-based feedback first draft. Retrieval is tiered to
control quota and minimize data. The human sets the rating, edits the wording, and submits.
The word "drafting" is load-bearing: this is a first-cut assistant, not a scoring engine and not a surveillance tool. If a request drifts toward covert monitoring, dirt-digging, or reading things the requester cannot already see, refuse and stop (see the gate below).
STEP 0 — Authorization gate (MANDATORY FIRST STEP — do not skip)
Before touching any data, present these five statements and require the user to explicitly confirm every one. If the user says "no", is evasive, or cannot answer any single item → refuse to run and explain which item failed. Do not partially proceed.
- Formal responsibility. "I have a formal evaluation/feedback responsibility for this person, within a sanctioned HR process."
- Policy compliance. "This complies with my company's privacy / HR / legal policy, which permits retrieving work communications for this specific purpose."
- Scope specified. "I have specified: the subject, the evaluation period (start/end dates), the purpose, and a whitelist of group chats to look at."
- Not for prohibited uses. "This is NOT for covert investigation, disciplinary evidence-gathering, digging up dirt, or evaluating sensitive/protected attributes (health, religion, sexual orientation, union activity, pregnancy, etc.)."
- Own identity only. "I will use only my own user identity — not a bot, not an admin, not an impersonation of anyone else. I can only ever read what I can already see."
What ships with it
8 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 211 lines · 190 tokens per session scan A 090480f45b10
lark-peer-feedback-drafting is a skill published in the GitHub repository aaronartistzhang-afk/DailyWork (1 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 190 tokens to every session and 2,875 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
create-custom-grader
Use when converting an existing benchmark, rubric, verifier, task YAML/JSON, or domain check into SkillEvaluator BYOG/BYOT custom evaluation.
ab-test-generator
Generate A/B test variants for affiliate content. Triggers on: "create A/B test", "test my headline", "optimize my CTA", "generate variants", "split test ideas", "improve click-through rate", "test my landing page copy", "headline alternatives", "CTA variations", "which version is better", "optimize conversions"…
authoring-ci-workflows
Use when adding or editing a GitHub Actions workflow, composite action, or reusable workflow under .github/ — new CI jobs, triggers, matrices, checkout/clone tuning, action pinning, GitHub App token auth, concurrency groups, timeout-minutes, paths filters, caching, or runner choice. Covers PostHog's workflow-authoring…
debugging-mcp-analytics
Debug, support, and build PostHog MCP Analytics — product analytics for MCP servers (the @posthog/mcp and posthog.mcp SDKs plus the mcpanalytics product). Use when MCP analytics data looks wrong or missing ("events aren't showing", "intent clusters are empty", "sessions are missing", "per-tool numbers look wrong")…
qa-frontend
Internal PostHog developer frontend/browser QA skill. Use only when a PostHog developer explicitly asks to run frontend QA, browser-test a PR, verify a UI flow against the local PostHog stack, use qa-frontend, or QA current frontend changes with browser/runtime evidence. Do not use for generic code review, PR review…
building-product-empty-states
Guide for adding a product setup empty state — the skippable first-run screen a product scene shows until real data arrives, built on the shared ProductEmptyState component. Use when adding an empty state or first-run/setup screen to a product scene, declaring emptyState on a SceneExport, writing a product…