Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aaronnat23/disp8ch --skill github-pr-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aaronnat23/disp8chWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaronnat23/disp8ch/github-pr-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaronnat23/disp8ch/github-pr-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aaronnat23/disp8ch/github-pr-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaronnat23/disp8ch/github-pr-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aaronnat23/disp8ch/github-pr-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00180 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00072 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00036 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00018 |
Grade A, and why
github-pr-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
GitHub PR Workflow
Handle pull-request work as a clean sequence: inspect, review, patch, verify, and summarize.
Use when
- A user asks for PR review, follow-up commits, or merge-readiness checks.
- GitHub issues, PRs, and repo state all matter to the answer.
Workflow
- Identify the repo, branch, PR, or issue context first.
- Read the diff and classify risk before proposing changes.
- Prefer concrete findings: bug risk, missing tests, rollback risk, or docs drift.
- If code changes are needed, patch the smallest safe scope and verify locally.
- End with a concise PR-style summary: findings, fixes, tests, and open risks.
Deliverable
- Clear review findings or implementation outcome.
- Relevant repo/PR references.
- Verification summary.
- Remaining blockers before merge.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 21 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 78299f49ae86
github-pr-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository aaronnat23/disp8ch (99 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 180 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-this-branch
Run the nohuman review gate (fresh-session adversarial reviewer + tamper guard) over the current branch or a GitHub pull request, with no server, no database, and no onboarding, and relay the pass/fail checklist.
Codex
Guides operator-owned delegation to Codex when the task fits a bounded coding lane, review pass, or worktree-isolated implementation track.
GitHub PR Workflow
Move cleanly through branch, diff, review, validation, and PR update steps without losing scope or repository-native workflow.
github-code-review
Review code changes by analyzing git diffs, leaving inline comments on PRs, and performing thorough pre-push review. Works with gh CLI or falls back to git + GitHub REST API via curl.
github-pr-workflow
Prepare a GitHub pull request from a feature branch — branch hygiene, commit shape, title/body, verification notes, screenshots for UI work, and replies to review comments.
github-automation
GitHub workflow automation, PR management, issue tracking, and code review coordination. Integrates with GitHub Actions and repository management. Use when: PR creation, code review, issue management, release automation, workflow setup. Skip when: local-only changes, non-GitHub repositories.