Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aaronnat23/disp8ch --skill requesting-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aaronnat23/disp8chWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaronnat23/disp8ch/requesting-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaronnat23/disp8ch/requesting-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aaronnat23/disp8ch/requesting-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaronnat23/disp8ch/requesting-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aaronnat23/disp8ch/requesting-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00113 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00045 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00023 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00011 |
Grade A, and why
requesting-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Requesting Code Review
Prepare a code change for review so reviewers can focus on the real risks instead of reconstructing context.
Use when
- A patch is ready for review and needs a clean reviewer-facing summary.
- The user wants to ask another agent or teammate for review efficiently.
Workflow
- Summarize the behavioral change, not just edited files.
- Call out risk areas, migration impact, and missing tests.
- Include the exact validation already run.
- Ask for review on the uncertain or high-impact parts first.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 14 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A d1e9cc9f3327
requesting-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository aaronnat23/disp8ch (99 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 113 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-this-branch
Run the nohuman review gate (fresh-session adversarial reviewer + tamper guard) over the current branch or a GitHub pull request, with no server, no database, and no onboarding, and relay the pass/fail checklist.
Codex
Guides operator-owned delegation to Codex when the task fits a bounded coding lane, review pass, or worktree-isolated implementation track.
GitHub PR Workflow
Move cleanly through branch, diff, review, validation, and PR update steps without losing scope or repository-native workflow.
github-code-review
Review code changes by analyzing git diffs, leaving inline comments on PRs, and performing thorough pre-push review. Works with gh CLI or falls back to git + GitHub REST API via curl.
github-pr-workflow
Prepare a GitHub pull request from a feature branch — branch hygiene, commit shape, title/body, verification notes, screenshots for UI work, and replies to review comments.
github-automation
GitHub workflow automation, PR management, issue tracking, and code review coordination. Integrates with GitHub Actions and repository management. Use when: PR creation, code review, issue management, release automation, workflow setup. Skip when: local-only changes, non-GitHub repositories.