Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add abdullahkhawer/devops-skills --skill terraform-lintinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/abdullahkhawer/devops-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/abdullahkhawer/devops-skills/terraform-linting)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/abdullahkhawer/devops-skills/terraform-linting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/abdullahkhawer/devops-skills/terraform-linting/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/abdullahkhawer/devops-skills/terraform-linting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/abdullahkhawer/devops-skills/terraform-linting.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00702 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00281 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00140 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
terraform-linting scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 23d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Terraform Linting Skill
Run this skill when asked to lint, format, or check style for Terraform code.
Step 1 — Detect available tooling
which terraform tflint 2>/dev/null
ls .tflint.hcl 2>/dev/null
If tflint is not installed, inform the user and ask before installing:
brew install tflint
terraform fmt and terraform validate ship with the Terraform CLI, so no separate install is needed for those.
Step 2 — Run formatting check
terraform fmt -recursive -check -diff
Show the diff to the user before applying any formatting changes.
Step 3 — Run validation
terraform validate
Requires terraform init to have been run in the directory first — if it fails with a missing-provider error, inform the user rather than running init yourself if it would touch a real backend.
Step 4 — Run the linter
tflint --recursive
Respect the project's .tflint.hcl if present (enabled plugins/rules) — do not override it. If no .tflint.hcl exists, run with default rules and mention that a config file could be added.
Report all findings grouped by file, with line numbers and rule names (e.g. terraform_deprecated_index, aws_instance_invalid_type).
Step 5 — Apply fixes (only with user confirmation)
terraform fmt -recursive
tflint --fix --recursive
Only run auto-fix commands after showing the user what will change and getting explicit confirmation. Most tflint findings (e.g. deprecated syntax, unused variables, invalid instance types) require manual review even when a --fix is available.
Standard conventions enforced
- Formatting is always
terraform fmt-compliant (2-space indentation, aligned=signs). - Resource and variable names:
snake_case, descriptive, no redundant type prefixes (e.g.aws_instance.web, notaws_instance.aws_instance_web). - All variables have a
descriptionand, where sensible, atypeconstraint. - No hardcoded credentials, account IDs, or ARNs — use variables or data sources.
- Provider versions are pinned via
required_providersin aversions.tfor the root module.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 23d ago First seen · 86 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 6ef7e1b870e1
terraform-linting is a skill published in the GitHub repository abdullahkhawer/devops-skills (8 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 702 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-23.
Other skills, from other repositories
gcloud-usage
This skill should be used when user asks about "GCloud logs", "Cloud Logging queries", "Google Cloud metrics", "GCP observability", "trace analysis", or "debugging production issues on GCP".
proposal-troubleshoot
Diagnose a problem with the proposal skills themselves — a script that fails, a rule applied wrongly, output that contradicts the skill's own stated mandate — and assemble a bug report when it turns out to be a real defect. Use when a skill misbehaved, not when the proposal needs improving.
azure-diagnostics
Diagnose Azure application and infrastructure issues with a structured, evidence-based workflow. Use this skill when users ask to troubleshoot outages, latency, failures, configuration drift, or anomalies. Root cause analysis using logs, metrics, traces, and dependency mapping.
apex-azure-diagnostics
WORKFLOW SKILL — Debug Azure production issues: Container Apps, Functions, App Service, AKS, VMs and messaging, with KQL log analysis. WHEN: 'troubleshoot container apps', 'troubleshoot AKS', 'pod crashloop', 'VM RDP or SSH failure', 'app service high CPU', 'service bus errors'. DO NOT USE FOR: pre-deploy validation…
fabric-network-remediate
Diagnose and resolve Microsoft Fabric network performance issues including connectivity failures, latency, private endpoints, managed VNets, outbound access protection, gateway diagnostics, OneLake endpoint routing, service tag configuration, firewall allowlisting, DNS resolution, and Spark session startup delays. Use…
gke-workload-scaling-troubleshooting
Diagnoses GKE HorizontalPodAutoscaler (HPA) failures — metrics showing as , FailedGetResourceMetric / FailedGetScale / FailedComputeMetricsReplicas events, missing Pod resource requests, custom/external metrics-pipeline breakage (FailedGetExternalMetric / FailedGetCustomMetric, unavailable metrics adapter…