Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add abhisekjha/pith --skill pith-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/abhisekjha/pithWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/abhisekjha/pith/pith-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/abhisekjha/pith/pith-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/abhisekjha/pith/pith-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/abhisekjha/pith/pith-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/abhisekjha/pith/pith-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00465 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00233 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00093 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
pith-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Plan format. Numbered steps. No narrative.
Goal: [what done looks like — one sentence]
Steps:
- [verb] [what] — [file or component]
- [verb] [what] — [file or component] ...
Risks: [what could block or break this] Done when: [exact, testable acceptance criteria]
Rules
- Steps: verb-first imperative. "Add", "Create", "Update", "Delete", "Test", "Wire". Not "We should add..."
- Each step: one line. Sub-steps as 1a/1b if needed.
- Done-when: observable and testable. Not "it works." Example: "All unit tests pass + /api/health returns 200 + no console errors in E2E"
- Risks: real blockers only. Not "might take longer than expected."
- No time estimates unless explicitly asked.
- Dependencies between steps: note them. "Step 3 requires step 1 complete."
Example
Goal: add email verification to user registration
Steps:
- Add
email_verifiedboolean column to users table —db/migrations/ - Create
EmailService.sendVerification(email, token)—src/services/email.ts - Generate + store verification token on register —
src/routes/auth.ts:register() - Add
GET /api/auth/verify?token=endpoint —src/routes/auth.ts - Block login for unverified users, return 403 with message —
src/middleware/auth.ts - Add integration test for full verification flow —
tests/auth.test.ts
Risks:
- Email delivery failures in test env — mock EmailService in tests
- Token expiry logic needed — decide TTL before step 2
Done when: POST /register triggers email + GET /verify?token=valid sets verified=true + unverified login returns 403
One-shot. Does not persist.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 48 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 158583457afc
pith-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository abhisekjha/pith (98 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 465 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
huggingface-llm-trainer
Train or fine-tune language models with TRL or Unsloth on Hugging Face Jobs, including SFT, DPO, GRPO, reward models, and GGUF conversion. Use for cloud LLM training; use huggingface-vision-trainer for vision tasks.
feature-dev
Guide a feature implementation through a structured seven-phase workflow with deep codebase understanding, clarifying questions, parallel architecture design, and quality review. Use this skill when the user asks to build a new feature, add functionality, or wants a methodical approach to implementation rather than…
cco-tools
Show what tools actually cost in tokens — learned per-tool averages from observed results, replacing the hardcoded MCP/Agent guesses.
github-pr-creation
Creates GitHub Pull Requests with automated validation and task tracking. Use when user wants to create PR, open pull request, submit for review, or check if ready for PR. Analyzes commits, validates task completion, generates Conventional Commits title and description, suggests labels. NOTE - for merging existing…
test-run
Run plugin test suites in this monorepo and report a concise pass/fail summary. Optional plugin slug arg; without arg, runs all plugins under plugins/.
design-system-reference
Style guides and implementation rules for frontend design. Works with design-discovery agent which handles context gathering and VS-based style recommendations. Contains detailed style guides, anti-patterns, and implementation checklists.