Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/abilityai/abilities/add-orchestratornpx skills add Abilityai/abilities --skill add-orchestratorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Abilityai/abilitiesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/abilityai/abilities/add-orchestrator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/abilityai/abilities/add-orchestrator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/abilityai/abilities/add-orchestrator.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00087 | $0.13584 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.06792 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.02717 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.01358 |
Grade B, and why
add-orchestrator scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Enumerates other installed skillsmediumAgent snooping
Other skills' SKILL.md files reveal prompts, capabilities and secrets that should be invisible to peers.
Re-running is safe: existing `fleet/sources.yaml`, `fleet/system-map.yaml`, and `fleet/orchestration.md` are never clobbered (only seeded when absent); the CLAUDE.md section, the `@fleet/orchestration.md` import, and the How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 475 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Add Orchestrator
ℹ️ First, set expectations: before anything else, print one short line with this skill's version and its most recent change — the top entry of
metadata.changelogabove — e.g.add-orchestrator vX.Y — recent: <summary>. Then proceed.
Turn any Trinity-compatible agent into a system-aware orchestrator: an agent that knows what other agents exist (deployed or just sitting in a GitHub repo), what each can do, and can route work to them, batch across them, or roll one out ephemerally, use it, and spin it back down.
🔍 Already installed?
/add-orchestrator --checkruns a read-only divergence report — per installed skill: upgrade available, back-port candidate (your copy is ahead of the bundle), or a local customization about to be clobbered — before you re-run and overwrite anything. See Check mode below.
Two modes — pick by whether the fleet already exists. Don't force a linear pipeline.
Mode A · Describe & route over an EXISTING fleet (read-only — the common case)
live Trinity and/or fleet/sources.yaml ──/discover-agents──▶ system-map.yaml (+ orchestration.md) ──/orchestrate──▶ work
The map (facts) + orchestration.md (intent) ARE the read surface. No manifest, no deploy. Skip /compose-system.
Mode B · Provision a NEW system (create agents that today are only catalog repos)
author orchestration.md §5 ──/compose-system──▶ fleet/system.yaml (SystemManifest) ──deploy──▶ /orchestrate
Artifacts (four layers):
fleet/sources.yaml you curate — local paths + github:Org/repo (optional when discovering from live Trinity)
fleet/system-map.yaml FACTS (nodes) — descriptive, written by /discover-agents (Mode A stops here)
fleet/orchestration.md NARRATIVE (edges + intent) — human prose + tool-refreshed blocks; imported into CLAUDE.md
fleet/system.yaml Trinity SystemManifest — prescriptive, written by /compose-system (Mode B only)
Maintenance (keep the fleet + its narrative honest over time):
/sync-fleet-to-head non-destructively bring in-scope agents to their GitHub HEAD
/profile-fleet interview + introspect agents, reconcile reality, correct orchestration.md
/fleet-reconcile fold already-verified deltas into every doc surface — no new evidence, one gate
Drive (opt-in project-management layer — Q3 at install):
/project-init create/adopt a managed project (epic + workspace) per fleet/project-standard.md
/project-steward autonomous sweep: reconcile dispatches, dispatch next work to labeled owners,
escalate stalls, age the operator's open loops, write a daily digest —
never asks mid-run
Loop closure (standard §12) runs through the whole bundle. Silence is a failure mode, not an outcome, in both directions. Inbound: /orchestrate isn't done until the requester has actually been told the outcome — including when the run failed — and the steward's digest opens with what's now true, what's waiting on the operator, and what happens next unprompted. Outbound: work parked on somebody the fleet can't dispatch to — a client, a vendor, a colleague, an agent in another fleet — is labeled waiting-on:<actor>, aged in every digest under Your open loops, and handed to the operator with a drafted follow-up. The agent drafts; the human sends — nothing in this bundle contacts a third party on the operator's behalf.
Design invariant (do not violate): orchestration is agent-owned. Trinity supplies the substrate (shared folders, agent-to-agent permissions, MCP messaging, cron) but runs no central DAG engine. So the roll-out → work → tear-down lifecycle lives inside /orchestrate — stitched from existing MCP calls — never as a new platform primitive. The multi-agent definition aligns 1:1 with Trinity's SystemManifest (the same YAML deploy_system consumes); this skill does not invent a competing format.
Sibling layer — /add-pipeline: this skill is the inter-agent layer (route / fan out / lifecycle across a fleet); /add-pipeline is the intra-agent one (a population of items crawling through a staged DAG inside a single agent, advanced by that agent's own heartbeat). They compose, same invariant on both sides: /discover-agents surfaces each fleet agent's pipelines (pipelines: per map node, scanned from projects/*/pipeline.yaml), and /orchestrate routes pipeline-shaped work to the owning agent rather than re-sequencing its stages as a cross-agent chain. Conversely, when one pipeline's instances are really isolated tenants, the answer is one agent per tenant via this orchestrator — add-pipeline's "multi-instance, not multi-tenant" boundary points here.
What ships with it
14 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- templates/capabilities-block.template.yaml 2.1 KB
- templates/claude-section.md 3.6 KB
- templates/compose-system.md 12 KB
- templates/discover-agents.md 28 KB
- templates/fleet-reconcile.md 12 KB
- templates/orchestrate.md 37 KB
- templates/orchestration.md.template 4.8 KB
- templates/profile-fleet.md 23 KB
- templates/project-init.md 5.8 KB
- templates/project-standard.md.template 14 KB
- templates/project-steward.md 25 KB
- templates/sources.example 942 B
- templates/sync-fleet-to-head.md 18 KB
- templates/system-map.yaml.template 3.4 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 475 lines · 87 tokens per session scan B 06b82d633cb6
add-orchestrator is a skill published in the GitHub repository Abilityai/abilities (11 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 13,584 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (enumerates other installed skills). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…