deep-research

deep-research is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from Abilityai/cornelius. It costs 21 tokens per session (4,962 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An automated research workflow that gathers recent papers and developments, extracts useful findings, and links them to an existing knowledge base. Its research results are stored separately from the main collection.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for directed research on specified topics or for choosing research opportunities automatically, then extracting insights and discovering related notes.
Why use it?
It organizes the work of researching a topic and connecting new findings to information you already keep.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/abilityai/cornelius/deep-research
Any agent
npx skills add Abilityai/cornelius --skill deep-research
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Abilityai/cornelius

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 21 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,962 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00021 $0.04962
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.02481
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00992
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00496

Measured 3d ago against content hash 30e041d693fa, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

deep-research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/deep-research/SKILL.md · 622 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 622 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Deep Research & Knowledge Integration Pipeline

You are orchestrating a fully autonomous research → extraction → connection discovery workflow to expand the knowledge base with cutting-edge insights.

Input Processing

User Input: $ARGUMENTS

Execution Modes:

  1. Directed Mode - User specifies topic(s): $ARGUMENTS = "neuroscience of habits" or $ARGUMENTS = "multi-agent systems, safety alignment"
  2. Autonomous Mode - You select topics: $ARGUMENTS = "" or $ARGUMENTS = "auto"

Mission

Execute a complete 3-phase autonomous research pipeline:

  1. RESEARCH - Gather cutting-edge papers and developments
  2. EXTRACT - Pull unique insights from research findings
  3. CONNECT - Map connections to existing knowledge base

Critical Requirement: ALL extracted insights MUST be stored in Document Insights folder structure to keep separate from main Brain.


Phase 1: Topic Selection & Research Planning

A. If User Provided Topic(s) (Directed Mode)

  • Parse $ARGUMENTS for topic(s)
  • Validate topics are research-worthy
  • Plan research scope for each topic

B. If Autonomous Mode

Analyze knowledge base to identify research opportunities:

  1. Read knowledge base analysis:

    cat knowledge-base-analysis.md
    
  2. Check recent activity:

    ls -lt Brain/Document\ Insights/ | head -10
    
  3. Identify gaps based on:

    • Underrepresented domains in knowledge-base-analysis.md
    • Missing connections flagged in recent changelogs
    • Emerging themes from existing insights
    • User's recent work patterns
    • CLAUDE.md priorities and future directions
  4. Select 1-3 research topics that would:

    • Fill identified gaps
    • Build on existing strengths (e.g., Buddhism-Neuroscience-AI triangle)
    • Connect underexplored domains
    • Add empirical validation to intuitive frameworks
    • Challenge or extend current thinking

Examples of Good Topic Selection:

  • "Neuroscience of habits and behavior change" (if habit formation underrepresented)
  • "Collective intelligence and swarm behavior" (if group dynamics missing)
  • "Embodied cognition and interoception" (if embodiment gap identified)
  • "Complexity science and emergence" (if systems thinking needed)
  • "Creativity neuroscience and insight generation" (if creative process mechanics missing)

Read the full file on GitHub · 622 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 622 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 30e041d693fa

Subscribe to this mod's changes

deep-research is a skill published in the GitHub repository Abilityai/cornelius (104 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 4,962 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens

chat-perf

Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.

microsoft/vscode · 51 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens