Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/abilityai/cornelius/dialecticnpx skills add Abilityai/cornelius --skill dialecticgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Abilityai/corneliusWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00122 | $0.22760 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00061 | $0.11380 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.04552 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.02276 |
Grade A, and why
dialectic scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,144 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
The Electric Monks — Dialectic Skill
An artificial belief system for building deeper understanding through productive contradiction.
Two subagent sessions — the Electric Monks — believe fully committed positions so you don't have to. A third (the orchestrator) performs structural analysis of their contradiction and generates a synthesis (Aufhebung) that transforms the question itself. The user orchestrates from a belief-free position, freed from the cognitive load of holding either position.
Why this works: The bottleneck in human reasoning isn't intelligence — it's belief. Once you believe a position, you can't simultaneously hold its negation at full strength. You hedge, you steelman weakly, you unconsciously bias the comparison. The Electric Monks carry the belief load at full conviction, which frees you to operate in the space above belief — analyzing the structure of the contradiction rather than being inside either side. In Boyd's terms: outsourcing belief work leads to faster transients. Each dialectical cycle is a reorientation that would take weeks of natural thinking, compressed into minutes because you carry zero belief inertia.
When to Use This Skill
Use when:
- The user wants to stress-test an idea against the strongest possible counter-argument
- The user is torn between two positions and the tension feels genuine, not just a preference
- A decision has real stakes and the tradeoffs are unclear
- The user wants to build a deeper mental model of a domain, not just pick an answer
- The problem space is poorly understood and needs exploration from multiple angles
- Requirements genuinely conflict and can't be resolved by simple tradeoff analysis
Do NOT use when:
- The question is purely empirical (just look up the answer)
- One side is obviously correct and doesn't need dialectical treatment
- The user wants a quick recommendation, not deep analysis
<core_concepts>
Core Concepts (Read This First)
Three frameworks drive every phase of this skill. Internalize them before proceeding — they determine how you execute, not just why.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 1,144 lines · 122 tokens per session scan A 6c0f239ee2b9
dialectic is a skill published in the GitHub repository Abilityai/cornelius (104 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 122 tokens to every session and 22,760 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
omni-mcp
Connect to the OmniRoute MCP server (110 tools, 3 transports: SSE/stdio/HTTP). Covers routing, cache, compression, memory, skills, providers, and audit tools across 33 permission scopes.
add-resend
Add Resend (email) channel integration via Chat SDK.
a-evolve
Apply A-Evolve's agentic evolution methodology to improve AI agent performance across runs. Use when the user wants to diagnose agent failures, generate targeted skills from error patterns, evolve system prompts, or accumulate episodic knowledge. Works standalone or inside AutoResearchClaw pipelines. Triggers on…
workflows
Execute a workflow script that orchestrates multiple subagents deterministically. Use when the user explicitly requests a workflow, multi-agent orchestration, parallel or sequential agent pipelines, structured agent outputs, or a durable background workflow run.
agent-tuning
Use when changing agent model or effort configuration, adapter mappings, or eval candidate profiles.
ax-python-agent
Use when writing Python code with axllm for agents, child delegation, tools, MCP, citations, persistent playbook learning, stage instructions, runtime state, final typed responses, and direct-respond executor skipping.