Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add abiswas97/gemini-plugin-cc --skill gemini-result-handlinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/abiswas97/gemini-plugin-ccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/abiswas97/gemini-plugin-cc/gemini-result-handling)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/abiswas97/gemini-plugin-cc/gemini-result-handling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/abiswas97/gemini-plugin-cc/gemini-result-handling/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/abiswas97/gemini-plugin-cc/gemini-result-handling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/abiswas97/gemini-plugin-cc/gemini-result-handling.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00360 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00180 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00072 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
gemini-result-handling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to codex-result-handling — 20 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Gemini Result Handling
When the helper returns Gemini output:
- Preserve the helper's verdict, summary, findings, and next steps structure.
- For review output, present findings first and keep them ordered by severity.
- Use the file paths and line numbers exactly as the helper reports them.
- Preserve evidence boundaries. If Gemini marked something as an inference, uncertainty, or follow-up question, keep that distinction.
- Preserve output sections when the prompt asked for them, such as observed facts, inferences, open questions, touched files, or next steps.
- If there are no findings, say that explicitly and keep the residual-risk note brief.
- If Gemini made edits, say so explicitly and list the touched files when the helper provides them.
- For
gemini:gemini-rescue, do not turn a failed or incomplete Gemini run into a Claude-side implementation attempt. Report the failure and stop. - For
gemini:gemini-rescue, if Gemini was never successfully invoked, do not generate a substitute answer at all. - CRITICAL: After presenting review findings, STOP. Do not make any code changes. Do not fix any issues. You MUST explicitly ask the user which issues, if any, they want fixed before touching a single file. Auto-applying fixes from a review is strictly forbidden, even if the fix is obvious.
- If the helper reports malformed output or a failed Gemini run, include the most actionable stderr lines and stop there instead of guessing.
- If the helper reports that setup or authentication is required, direct the user to
/gemini:setupand do not improvise alternate auth flows.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 22 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 8e7ee9d21499
gemini-result-handling is a skill published in the GitHub repository abiswas97/gemini-plugin-cc (47 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 360 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to codex-result-handling, differing in 20 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
agy-prompting
Internal helper — how to tighten a user request into a sharp prompt for the Antigravity CLI (agy / Gemini 3.x with native web search and agentic tools).
gemini-file-analysis
Analyze files (PDFs, images, audio, video, large source files) via Gemini's multi-modal file analysis. Use when a file is too large for Claude's context or when the file is a non-text format requiring visual/audio understanding.
gemini-prompting
Internal guidance for composing effective grounded search queries.
gemini-prompting
Internal guidance for composing Gemini prompts for planning, research, diagnosis, and review tasks inside the Gemini Claude Code plugin.
grok-prompting
Internal guidance for composing Grok prompts for planning, research, diagnosis, and review tasks inside the Grok Claude Code plugin.
gemini-best-practices
Review and fix Gemini API usage against Google's official best practices. Use when modifying src/core/gemini.ts, adding new API calls, or auditing Gemini integration quality.