Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to ably/ably-cli. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ably/ably-cli/main/.claude/skills/ably-codebase-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ably/ably-cliWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ably/ably-cli/ably-codebase-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ably/ably-cli/ably-codebase-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ably/ably-cli/ably-codebase-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ably/ably-cli/ably-codebase-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ably/ably-cli/ably-codebase-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00101 | $0.04925 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00040 | $0.01970 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00985 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00492 |
Grade A, and why
ably-codebase-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 262 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Ably Codebase Review
This skill reviews the entire Ably CLI codebase against the conventions defined in the ably-new-command skill. It uses a combination of LSP for structural analysis (type hierarchies, call chains, symbol definitions) and grep/read for text-pattern checks, choosing the right tool for each check.
Tool selection guide
Use LSP when you need type-system awareness:
goToDefinition— resolve what base class a command actually extends (not just the import text)findReferences— trace all callers offail(),logJsonResult,logJsonEventthrough inheritancehover— reveal resolved types, inherited members, full type hierarchydocumentSymbol— list all methods/properties in a class structurally
Use grep/read when a text match is sufficient:
this.error()calls in command files- Component string casing in
this.fail()andlogCliEvent()calls new Error(...)wrapping inthis.fail()calls (unnecessary — accepts strings)shouldOutputJsonguards aroundthis.log()formatSuccess()calls ending with.formatProgress()calls with manual...chalk.cyan()whereformatResource()should be used- Quoted resource names instead of
formatResource(name) --json/--pretty-jsoninstatic examplesarrays- Flag spreads like
...productApiFlags,...durationFlag,...clientIdFlag waitUntilInterruptedOrTimeoutusage- Missing test files (glob for them)
--durationflag in subscribe test files- Mock helper imports (
getMockAblyRealtime,getMockAblyRest,getMockConfigManager)
Step 0: Verify LSP prerequisites
Before doing any analysis, check that the LSP tooling is available:
- Check for the LSP tool — verify the
LSPtool is available in your tool list. If it is not, tell the user:The LSP plugin is not installed. Install it by running:
claude plugin add anthropic/claude-code-lspThen restart Claude Code and re-run this skill. Stop here — do not proceed without the LSP tool.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 262 lines · 101 tokens per session scan A d7b8bdc5d89b
ably-codebase-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository ably/ably-cli (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 101 tokens to every session and 4,925 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…