Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aborroy/aiup-alfresco --skill migration-advisorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aborroy/aiup-alfrescoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aborroy/aiup-alfresco/migration-advisor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aborroy/aiup-alfresco/migration-advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aborroy/aiup-alfresco/migration-advisor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aborroy/aiup-alfresco/migration-advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aborroy/aiup-alfresco/migration-advisor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00285 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00143 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00057 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
migration-advisor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Migration Advisor
Scan Alfresco extension code for deprecated API usage and suggest modern replacements.
Deprecated Patterns
| Deprecated | Replacement | Since |
|---|---|---|
ServiceRegistry.getNodeService() |
@Autowired NodeService |
SDK 4.x+ |
AuthenticationUtil.setFullyAuthenticatedUser() |
AuthenticationUtil.runAs() |
SDK 4.x+ |
| Direct Hibernate session access | NodeService / ContentService |
Always |
| AMP packaging with no third-party library deps | JAR packaging | SDK 4.2+ |
AbstractLifecycleBean for bootstrap |
@PostConstruct / ApplicationReadyEvent |
Spring Boot 3.x |
| Alfresco Explorer (JSF) customizations | ACA/ADW extensions | ACS 6.0+ |
| CMIS 1.0 | CMIS 1.1 or REST API v1 | ACS 5.2+ |
| Lucene query syntax | AFTS or CMIS query | ACS 4.0+ |
Output
For each deprecated usage found, report: file, line, deprecated API, suggested replacement, and migration effort estimate (trivial/moderate/significant).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 26 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 8d8314fa4d0e
migration-advisor is a skill published in the GitHub repository aborroy/aiup-alfresco (13 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 285 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-work
Post-implementation gate review: run manual QA on the real surface yourself, then launch ONE gate reviewer (never a panel) to audit goal, constraints, code quality, security, missed context, and QA evidence. Use before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work.
one-way-door
Flags irreversible decisions before commit. Use for data models, infra, auth boundaries, API contracts, event schemas, CI/CD.
map-codebase
Deep architecture report that fans out parallel inspections across different aspects of the codebase (structure, tech stack, APIs, patterns, data flow, dependencies, testing) and synthesizes findings into a comprehensive document at .turbo/codebase-map.md and .turbo/codebase-map.html. Use when the user asks to "map…
critical-code-reviewer
Rigorously review code or pull requests for correctness, security, accessibility, maintainability, tests, and edge cases. Use when users request a critical code review, want a guided walkthrough of findings, need implementer-facing feedback, or want to prepare, create, or submit a GitHub pull request review.
reply-to-pr-threads
Draft, confirm, and post replies to GitHub PR review threads. Handles per-category reply formatting, re-fetches thread resolution state so auto-resolved threads are skipped, and posts via GraphQL. Use when the user asks to "reply to PR threads", "post PR thread replies", or "draft PR reply messages".
answer-reviewer-questions
For each reviewer question on a PR, recall implementation reasoning and compose a raw answer. Use when the user asks to "answer reviewer questions", "draft answers to PR questions", or "explain reviewer questions".