pos-ai: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/api-review/SKILL.md

api-review is a skill for Claude Code from abuango/pos-ai. It costs 56 tokens per session (1,258 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide for reviewing APIs, which are interfaces that let software systems communicate. It checks endpoint names, resource structure, versioning, and consistency.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review REST endpoints, naming conventions, URL structure, identifiers, versioning, and API design.
Why use it?
It helps prevent confusing or inconsistent API contracts that are difficult to change after publication.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

This is abuango/pos-ai's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on pos-ai itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything pos-ai configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to abuango/pos-ai. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/abuango/pos-ai/main/.claude/skills/api-review/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/abuango/pos-ai

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for api-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/abuango/pos-ai/api-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/abuango/pos-ai/api-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/abuango/pos-ai/api-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/abuango/pos-ai/api-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for api-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/abuango/pos-ai/api-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/abuango/pos-ai/api-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 56 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,258 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00056 $0.01258
Opus 5.5 $0.00022 $0.00503
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00252
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00126

Measured 2mo ago against content hash cb07332b2cb2, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

api-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/api-review/SKILL.md · 149 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 149 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

API Review Skill

Setup

Before starting: check .handoff/sessions/ for active sessions, read context status.yaml, run git status. Follow .rules/universal.md (Plan -> Approve -> Execute).

You are reviewing API design for consistency, correctness, and adherence to REST best practices. APIs are contracts — once published, they're hard to change.

Process

Step 1: Discover Endpoints

  1. Find route files — Look for:
    • Laravel: routes/api.php, routes/web.php
    • Express/Fastify: routes/, src/routes/
    • Next.js: app/api/, pages/api/
  2. List all endpoints — Method, path, controller, middleware
  3. Check for API versioning — /api/v1/, /api/v2/ patterns

Step 2: Review Naming Conventions

Check every endpoint against these rules:

  • Nouns, not verbs — /users not /getUsers
  • Plural resources — /users not /user
  • Kebab-case for multi-word — /user-preferences not /userPreferences
  • Nested resources for relationships — /users/{id}/orders not /user-orders
  • Consistent ID parameter naming — {id} or {userId} but not mixed
  • No trailing slashes — /users not /users/
  • No file extensions — /users not /users.json

Step 3: Review HTTP Methods

  • GET — Read only, no side effects, cacheable
  • POST — Create new resource, returns 201 + Location header
  • PUT — Full update (replace), idempotent
  • PATCH — Partial update, only changed fields
  • DELETE — Remove resource, returns 204 or 200

Common mistakes:

  • POST for updates (should be PUT/PATCH)
  • GET with side effects (should be POST)
  • DELETE that returns the deleted resource without the client needing it

Step 4: Review Response Format

Check for consistent response structure:

// Success (single resource)
{
  "data": { "id": "...", "type": "user", ... }
}

// Success (collection)
{
  "data": [...],
  "meta": { "total": 100, "page": 1, "per_page": 20 }
}

// Error
{
  "error": {
    "code": "VALIDATION_ERROR",
    "message": "Human-readable message",
    "details": [{ "field": "email", "message": "Required" }]
  }
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 149 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 149 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A cb07332b2cb2

Subscribe to this mod's changes

api-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository abuango/pos-ai (2 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 1,258 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

platform-apex-generate

Primary Apex authoring skill for class generation, refactoring, and review. ALWAYS ACTIVATE when the user mentions Apex, .cls, triggers, or asks to create/refactor a class (service, selector, domain, batch, queueable, schedulable, invocable, DTO, utility, interface, abstract, exception, REST resource). Use this skill…

forcedotcom/sf-skills · 122 tokens

flow-next-impl-review

Carmack-level implementation review of changes via the configured backend. Use when asked to review code or a diff in a flow-next repo.

gmickel/flow-next · 34 tokens

flow-next-resolve-pr

Resolve PR review feedback. Fetches unresolved threads, triages, fixes, replies and resolves via GraphQL. Use when asked to address review comments.

gmickel/flow-next · 36 tokens

api-contract-review

Use when auditing CloudBase cloud API wrappers, MCP tools, generated action metadata, or related docs for outdated or incorrect action names, parameters, casing, request shapes, or missing contract tests, especially during periodic quality review or before preparing corrective PRs.

TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-AI-Toolkit · 54 tokens

ring:migrating-to-lib-observability

Migrating a Lerian Go app off lib-commons observability imports (deprecated shims or removed APIs) to lib-observability via a fixed mapping table, then bumps go.mod and validates the build; ring:backend-go applies the edits. Covers log/zap/runtime/assert, opentelemetry/tracing, HTTP middleware, context helpers, and…

LerianStudio/ring · 104 tokens

ring:mapping-streaming-events

Mapping the eventable points in a Lerian Go service where lib-streaming should emit past-tense, durable, tenant-scoped business events, producing a PM-validated event catalog and instrumentation-map.json for ring:instrumenting-streaming-events. Three-pass discovery (Survey, Slice, Mark) with a scope fence and delivery…

LerianStudio/ring · 95 tokens