Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to abuango/pos-ai. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/abuango/pos-ai/main/.claude/skills/debugging/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/abuango/pos-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/abuango/pos-ai/debugging)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/abuango/pos-ai/debugging"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/abuango/pos-ai/debugging/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/abuango/pos-ai/debugging"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/abuango/pos-ai/debugging.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.01302 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00521 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00260 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00130 |
Grade C, and why
debugging scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Recursive force deletehighDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
- Check `.next/` cache — `rm -rf .next` if stale How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 142 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Debugging Skill
You are systematically debugging an issue. Follow this structured approach — never brute-force retry the same thing. Every step narrows the search space.
Setup
Before starting: check .handoff/sessions/ for active sessions, read context status.yaml, run git status. Follow .rules/universal.md (Plan -> Approve -> Execute).
Process
Step 1: Reproduce
Before anything else, confirm the bug exists and is reproducible.
- Get the error — Exact error message, stack trace, or unexpected behavior description
- Get the context — When did it start? What changed recently? Which environment?
- Reproduce locally — Run the failing command/test/request and capture the full output
- If not reproducible — Check environment differences, data differences, timing/race conditions
Output: "I can reproduce this: {exact steps and output}" — OR — "Cannot reproduce. Need: {what additional info is required}"
Step 2: Isolate
Narrow down where the bug lives.
- Check recent changes —
git log --oneline -20,git difffor uncommitted work - Trace the execution path — Follow the request/data from entry point to failure
- Binary search — If the codebase is large, bisect: does the bug exist in module A or B?
- Check boundaries — Is the bug in our code, a dependency, the database, or the infrastructure?
Key questions:
- Does it fail with the simplest possible input?
- Does it fail in a different environment?
- Does reverting the last change fix it?
- Is it data-dependent?
Output: "The bug is in {file}:{line_range} because {evidence}"
Step 3: Diagnose
Understand the root cause, not just the symptom.
- Read the code — Read the actual implementation, don't assume
- Check assumptions — What does the code assume about inputs, state, ordering?
- Look for common patterns:
- Null/undefined access — Missing null checks, optional chaining needed
- Race condition — Async operations completing in unexpected order
- State mutation — Shared state modified unexpectedly
- Type mismatch — String vs number, date formats, encoding
- Off-by-one — Array bounds, pagination, date ranges
- Missing migration — Database schema doesn't match model
- Cache stale — OPcache, view cache, query cache serving old data
- Environment mismatch — .env values, Docker config, service URLs
- Dependency version — Breaking change in updated package
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 142 lines · 56 tokens per session scan C 60e72b0f3088
debugging is a skill published in the GitHub repository abuango/pos-ai (2 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 1,302 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (recursive force delete). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when debugging a failing test, build error, or runtime issue that isn't immediately obvious. Guides a 4-phase root cause analysis instead of random fix attempts.
log-error-digest
Analyze log files to troubleshoot errors, identify peak error periods, and produce error clustering, frequency statistics, and time distribution reports. Supports JSON, syslog, and Nginx formats with automatic detection. Use when a user uploads a .log file and asks to analyze errors, find patterns, debug issues, or…
cwv-optimizer
Diagnose and fix Core Web Vitals issues on AEM Edge Delivery Services pages. Goes deeper than generic CWV advice by understanding EDS-specific performance patterns including the 100KB LCP budget, E-L-D loading phases, block rendering behavior, and third-party script impact. Produces specific fixes for LCP, CLS, and…
incident-response-incident-response
Coordinate production incident triage, mitigation, investigation, recovery, and follow-up. Use when responding to outages or other incidents that require structured operational coordination.
ci-fixer
CI failures - read error, minimal fix, verify.
diagnosing-missing-recordings
Diagnoses why a session recording is missing or was not captured. Use when a user asks why a session has no replay, why recordings aren't appearing, or wants to troubleshoot session replay capture issues for a specific session ID or across their project. Covers SDK diagnostic signals, project settings, sampling…