finish-task-workflow

finish-task-workflow is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from acaprino/daodan. It costs 69 tokens per session (3,447 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of assess-workflow, MIT.

A task-closing workflow for reviewing and merging the current Git branch, recording the final decision, updating related maps and documentation, and removing the worktree. A Git branch is a separate line of changes, and a worktree is a separate checkout of that branch.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when a task is complete and you want to review, authorize the merge, align its records and documentation, and clean up the branch workspace.
Why use it?
Finishing a task involves more than writing code: unfinished review, records, documentation, or temporary checkouts can be left behind. This workflow coordinates those closing steps after you approve the merge.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions subagents; mentions Codex.

Good fit Use it when a task is complete and you want to review, authorize the merge, align its records and documentation, and clean up the branch workspace.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/acaprino/daodan/finish-task-workflow
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add acaprino/daodan --skill finish-task-workflow
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/acaprino/daodan

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for finish-task-workflow

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/acaprino/daodan/finish-task-workflow/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/acaprino/daodan/finish-task-workflow)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/acaprino/daodan/finish-task-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/acaprino/daodan/finish-task-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for finish-task-workflow

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/acaprino/daodan/finish-task-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/acaprino/daodan/finish-task-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 69 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,447 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 80% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00069 $0.03447
Opus 5.5 $0.00028 $0.01379
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00014 $0.00689
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00345

Measured yesterday against content hash 099a617310d7, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

finish-task-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

80% identical to assess-workflow — 65 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

exports/codex/plugins/daodan/skills/finish-task-workflow/SKILL.md · 171 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 171 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

<daodan_host_binding host="codex"> This binding governs execution of this package and its loaded references. It takes precedence over executable examples written for another host. Use only registered tools and their actual input schema; an example never creates a tool, argument, permission, model alias or nested worker capability. Preserve the generated worker allowlist, dependency closure, scope and delivery contracts.

Codex binding: the adapter binds repository read to read_file, writes to apply_patch and shell execution to shell; use the equivalent registered tools of the active Codex runtime and their actual fields. In particular, a shell example's command, timeout and background fields are not automatically another runtime's cmd, yield_time_ms or session controls. Start the runtime's available isolated subagent mechanism with the complete rendered role body in its task prompt. Role Markdown and generated dispatch bodies are resources, not registered skills or a native role/subagent_type parameter. Use only declared role bindings and report an unavailable isolation mechanism. Load installed skills by their advertised exact IDs; workflow skills carry the -workflow suffix. Named-agent examples do not override inline delivery. Required foreign providers use Codex's marketplace/install commands: codex plugin marketplace add , then codex plugin add @. Register plugin-declared MCP servers through the active host's MCP configuration using the generated server command. Do not assume registration makes every tool available to a restricted worker. Inherit the active session's model and default variant. A source model alias such as sonnet is not a portable override; request a different model only through an explicit adapter mapping to a valid host identity and user authorization.

The executing agent and its coordinator own continuation, recovery, verification and delivery. Skills supply knowledge and method instructions; they are not executors or a runtime persistence mechanism.

Resolve each component by kind and exact installed identity. A role is dispatched as a worker, a skill loads instructions, and a workflow starts its declared method. Kernel owner-qualified skill references are logical provider identities: resolve them to the actual host registry name and verified installed provider path. Do not invent a registry string by adding an owner's prefix when the host does not use it. Do not load an agent identity as a skill or execute a workflow name as a shell command. Named foreign providers remain mandatory. If an installed provider, MCP server or required isolation mechanism is unavailable, stop its dependent phase and report the missing capability. Do not install a different host's plugin or substitute unrelated skills to claim coverage.

Shell execution alone does not establish interactive stdin. Before a capture or checkpoint, use an available session-control mechanism. When stdin is unavailable, keep user-driven capture in a supported background process with bounded output and an explicit stop signal controlled by the coordinator after the user's completion message. Close owned browser/process resources on completion or cancellation.

Continue working within the current authorization while the requested result is achievable. After a tool error, inspect its cause, correct the relevant input or implementation, retry when justified and verify the outcome; never repeat a failing action blindly. Do not close the turn with a promise or a partial result when an authorized next step can still produce or verify the requested result. Stop only for a documented real impediment, a missing required capability, an unresolved human decision or the caller's stop request. At that boundary, report completed results, remaining work and the concrete prerequisite for continuation; continue any independent work that the blocker does not prevent.

A tool's successful exit, a worker stop or an idle session is not the deliverable. Return final text naming observed findings, artifact paths, executed checks and blockers. An empty worker result is missing delivery: inspect or resume that worker when permitted, or record failure. Verify required artifacts and candidate gates before marking the requested outcome complete.

Read the full file on GitHub · 171 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 171 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A 099a617310d7

Subscribe to this mod's changes

finish-task-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository acaprino/daodan (9 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 3,447 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 80% identical to assess-workflow, differing in 65 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

mcore-split-pr

Split a PR into multiple PRs to reduce the number of required CODEOWNERS reviewer groups.

NVIDIA/skills · 25 tokens

engineer-bot-ops

A workflow for carrying an engineering task from scope through implementation and reviewable delivery. It works with a repository's branch, existing changes, rules, checks, and permissions while separating completed, unverified, and next-step work.

makecindy/cindy · 57 tokens

shiplog

Recap of everything shipped since the last run - cross-repo PRs, security fixes, star deltas, and X traction, synthesized into a digest article and a ready-to-post shiplog in your voice.

aeonfun/aeon · 46 tokens

connect

Choose which wiki this session uses, the team project's pages on the Nimbalyst server or the project's local wiki of files, and connect a repository to its team project. Use at the start of a task before any wiki tool, when a wiki tool returns reponotbound, ambiguousproject, pinmismatch, projectnotaccessible…

nimbalyst/nimbalyst · 101 tokens

llxprt-issue-workflow

Use this skill when asked to address, fix, or work on a GitHub issue in the llxprt-code repository. Covers the complete issue lifecycle - branch setup, gh CLI usage, test-first planning, subagent delegation and review loops, the full verification cycle (including the zai-glm-flash smoke test), open code review (ocr)…

vybestack/llxprt-code · 88 tokens

cuga-github-issues

Create GitHub issues for cuga-agent (bugs, features, epics, designs, and related work) against origin using gh, with epic → feature → issue hierarchy and GraphQL sub-issue linking. Use when the user says create new issues, report a bug, file a bug, feature request, new feature, create an epic, GitHub issue, sub-issue…

cuga-project/cuga-agent · 88 tokens