peer-review-packet-builder

peer-review-packet-builder is a skill for Claude Code from acaprino/daodan. It costs 80 tokens per session (2,913 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A packet-building skill that makes an unchanging review packet from a plan, specification, or decision brief. It includes the original artifact, its digest, extracted facts, and instructions for the response.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to prepare the input for a peer-review process from an existing plan, specification, or decision brief.
Why use it?
It gives reviewers a fixed version of the material so later edits do not silently change what was reviewed.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Good fit Use it to prepare the input for a peer-review process from an existing plan, specification, or decision brief.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/acaprino/daodan/peer-review-packet-builder
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add acaprino/daodan --skill peer-review-packet-builder
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/acaprino/daodan

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for peer-review-packet-builder

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/acaprino/daodan/peer-review-packet-builder/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/acaprino/daodan/peer-review-packet-builder)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/acaprino/daodan/peer-review-packet-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/acaprino/daodan/peer-review-packet-builder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for peer-review-packet-builder

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/acaprino/daodan/peer-review-packet-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/acaprino/daodan/peer-review-packet-builder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 80 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,913 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00080 $0.02913
Opus 5.5 $0.00032 $0.01165
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00016 $0.00583
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00291

Measured yesterday against content hash bd1b97c706e4, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

peer-review-packet-builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

exports/pi/plugins/peer-review/skills/peer-review-packet-builder/SKILL.md · 251 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 251 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

<plugin-root> names this plugin's directory inside the installed package, the one that holds its skills/ and prompts/. Resolve it once from where this file was loaded, then substitute it into every path below that starts with it.

<daodan_host_binding host="pi"> This binding governs execution of this package and its loaded references. It takes precedence over executable examples written for another host. Use only registered tools and their actual input schema; an example never creates a tool, argument, permission, model alias or nested worker capability. Preserve the generated worker allowlist, dependency closure, scope and delivery contracts.

Pi binding: repository reads use read/find/grep, writes use edit/write, and shell execution uses bash or the registered powershell alternative. Use their actual command, timeout and process-control schema rather than capitalized foreign tools. Core Pi supplies neither subagent nor MCP. Isolated workers require pi-subagents: pi install npm:pi-subagents. Use that extension's registered subagent schema and pass the full rendered role body inline. Role skills named - are body resources with automatic invocation disabled, not a built-in named agent. Workflow prompt entries use /-; ordinary skills use their exact registered names. If isolation is mandatory and unavailable, stop the phase. MCP requires pi-mcp-adapter: pi install npm:pi-mcp-adapter, then register the generated server command in its supported MCP configuration. Keep the selected package's full local dependency closure. Provision qualified foreign providers as skills/resources this runtime can load; Pi does not install another host's marketplace plugin from a Claude install command. Inherit the active session's model and default variant. A source model alias such as sonnet is not a portable override; request a different model only through an explicit adapter mapping to a valid host identity and user authorization. Kernel : references identify the logical provider. Ordinary Pi skills retain their source frontmatter name, so resolve the actual registered name and provider path from the active inventory; do not invent a prefixed native ID.

The executing agent and its coordinator own continuation, recovery, verification and delivery. Skills supply knowledge and method instructions; they are not executors or a runtime persistence mechanism.

Resolve each component by kind and exact installed identity. A role is dispatched as a worker, a skill loads instructions, and a workflow starts its declared method. Kernel owner-qualified skill references are logical provider identities: resolve them to the actual host registry name and verified installed provider path. Do not invent a registry string by adding an owner's prefix when the host does not use it. Do not load an agent identity as a skill or execute a workflow name as a shell command. Named foreign providers remain mandatory. If an installed provider, MCP server or required isolation mechanism is unavailable, stop its dependent phase and report the missing capability. Do not install a different host's plugin or substitute unrelated skills to claim coverage.

Shell execution alone does not establish interactive stdin. Before a capture or checkpoint, use an available session-control mechanism. When stdin is unavailable, keep user-driven capture in a supported background process with bounded output and an explicit stop signal controlled by the coordinator after the user's completion message. Close owned browser/process resources on completion or cancellation.

Continue working within the current authorization while the requested result is achievable. After a tool error, inspect its cause, correct the relevant input or implementation, retry when justified and verify the outcome; never repeat a failing action blindly. Do not close the turn with a promise or a partial result when an authorized next step can still produce or verify the requested result. Stop only for a documented real impediment, a missing required capability, an unresolved human decision or the caller's stop request. At that boundary, report completed results, remaining work and the concrete prerequisite for continuation; continue any independent work that the blocker does not prevent.

Read the full file on GitHub · 251 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 251 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A bd1b97c706e4

Subscribe to this mod's changes

peer-review-packet-builder is a skill published in the GitHub repository acaprino/daodan (9 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 2,913 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-20.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens