Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ackeskin/contexture/delivernpx skills add AcKeskin/contexture --skill delivergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AcKeskin/contextureWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ackeskin/contexture/deliver)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ackeskin/contexture/deliver"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ackeskin/contexture/deliver.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.01590 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00795 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00318 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00159 |
Grade A, and why
deliver scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 130 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
deliver
The delivery organ. Takes an already-selected set of fragments and produces the rendered block Claude reads.
When to run
- Another skill invokes this one programmatically, passing a fragment selection it has already filtered and scored (discovery for bodies, prep at task start, review during diff inspection, plan at milestone boundaries).
- Do not respond to user prose triggers. There is no
/delivercommand. There is no "when user says X" branch. Delivery is purely a format-and-assembly helper. - Stateless per call. No memoization, no cache, no hidden state.
Inputs
Structured, from the caller:
{
fragments: Fragment[], // already-selected; delivery does not re-filter
order_override?: Order, // optional; default = the §2 tier priority
cap?: number, // optional; default 20; hard ceiling regardless of caller
}
Fragment = {
path: string, // repo-relative or ~/-relative; source-of-truth pointer
frontmatter: { // parsed YAML
name: string,
description?: string,
type?: string,
kind?: string, // "architectural-rule" | "decision" | "lesson" | "preference" | ...
scope?: string[],
relevance?: string,
},
body: string, // verbatim content — delivery does not paraphrase
}
Order = "default" | "caller" | explicit-tier-list
Procedure
1. Validate inputs
fragmentspresent and non-empty. Empty → return empty string and a single-line note ([delivery: empty selection]). Never synthesise content.- Each fragment has
path,frontmatter.name,body. Missingpathorname→ render with the available fields, emit a[delivery: fragment missing <field>]marker inline so the caller notices. capbounded to[1, 20]. Caller-specified values outside this range are clamped; flag the clamp in the report line.
2. Sort
Default priority (highest tier first):
- Warnings —
frontmatter.kind == "warning". Landmines that earned their place by citing a real prior incident; surface ahead of everything because the cost of forgetting one is concrete. - Architectural rules —
frontmatter.kind == "architectural-rule". - Project-specific facts —
frontmatter.type == "project"ORfrontmatter.scopecontains anyproject-*tag. - Session recaps —
frontmatter.type == "session-recap". Episodic recall sits below project facts but above codemap, because "what I was investigating" gives more signal than raw file summaries when resuming work. - Codemap entries — fragments where
frontmatter.kind == "codemap"orfrontmatter.type == "codemap". (Discovery surfaces these when.claude/codemap.mdcontributes.) - Everything else — lessons, decisions, preferences, references, general feedback.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 130 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A ff66562182f2
deliver is a skill published in the GitHub repository AcKeskin/contexture (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,590 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
log-session
Append a structured entry to the project's session log (docs/LOGS.md): what was done this session, files touched, decisions taken, and the next step — so the next session (or another person) can pick up the thread without re-reading git history. Run it before /clear, before closing Claude Code, or at any natural…
context-scaffold
Analyzes an existing project and generates context files (AGENTS.md, context directory, cascading structure) pre-populated with discovered information. Run once to bootstrap, then customize.
ReasoningBank with AgentDB
Implement ReasoningBank adaptive learning with AgentDB's 150x faster vector database. Includes trajectory tracking, verdict judgment, memory distillation, and pattern recognition. Use when building self-learning agents, optimizing decision-making, or implementing experience replay systems.
AgentDB Memory Patterns
Implement persistent memory patterns for AI agents using AgentDB. Includes session memory, long-term storage, pattern learning, and context management. Use when building stateful agents, chat systems, or intelligent assistants.
V3 Memory Unification
Unify 6+ memory systems into AgentDB with HNSW indexing for 150x-12,500x search improvements. Implements ADR-006 (Unified Memory Service) and ADR-009 (Hybrid Memory Backend).
context-upgrade
Guides transition from your current context level to the next one -- minimal to full, full to cascading, or adding skills and hooks layers. Preserves existing content.