Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add adilkalam/orca --skill layoutgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adilkalam/orcaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/adilkalam/orca/layout)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/adilkalam/orca/layout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/adilkalam/orca/layout/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/adilkalam/orca/layout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/adilkalam/orca/layout.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.01942 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00777 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00388 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00194 |
Grade A, and why
layout scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 151 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Assess and improve layout and spacing that feels monotonous, crowded, or structurally weak — turning generic arrangements into intentional, rhythmic compositions.
MANDATORY PREPARATION
Run the cognition constraint loop (MANDATORY) — see ~/.claude/docs/reference/cognition-constraint-loop.md. (If design-builder loaded this skill only for craft reference, ignore this block and use the craft below.)
Alignment precision (NEW — runs throughout)
Apply the 7 optical alignment rules + base grid system + pixel-perfect audit. See ~/.claude/docs/concepts/design-contract/preferences/alignment-precision.md.
Balance as organizing principle (NEW)
Every layout has a deliberate visual entry point that carries the viewer to the destination without announcing. Negative/positive space balance. Floating-in-random-spot is refused — see ~/.claude/docs/concepts/design-contract/banned/alignment-spacing.md.
Assess Current Layout
Analyze what's weak about the current spatial design:
-
Spacing:
- Is spacing consistent or arbitrary? (Random padding/margin values)
- Is all spacing the same? (Equal padding everywhere = no rhythm)
- Are related elements grouped tightly, with generous space between groups?
-
Visual hierarchy:
- Apply the squint test: blur your (metaphorical) eyes — can you still identify the most important element, second most important, and clear groupings?
- Is hierarchy achieved effectively? (Space and weight alone can be enough — but is the current approach working?)
- Does whitespace guide the eye to what matters?
-
Grid & structure:
- Is there a clear underlying structure, or does the layout feel random?
- Are identical card grids used everywhere? (Icon + heading + text, repeated endlessly)
- Is everything centered? (Left-aligned with asymmetric layouts feels more designed, but not a hard and fast rule)
-
Rhythm & variety:
- Does the layout have visual rhythm? (Alternating tight/generous spacing)
- Is every section structured the same way? (Monotonous repetition)
- Are there intentional moments of surprise or emphasis?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 151 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A f1bff3cd0ae7
layout is a skill published in the GitHub repository adilkalam/orca (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 1,942 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
webgl-holographic-foil
A self-contained WebGL2 hero: thin-film interference over a crushed-foil surface whose palette shifts with the viewing angle; move the cursor to tilt the film.
html-ppt-hermes-cyber-terminal
OpenDesign + BYOK: choosing and wiring your own model, hands-on — cost, quality, and the routing decision. Built as a decision-grade AI literacy deck for engineers, IT, applied-AI teams.
html-ppt-taste-brutalist
16:9 HTML deck in tactical-telemetry / CRT-terminal taste. Deactivated-CRT charcoal slides, white-phosphor monospace, hazard-red accent, scanline overlay, ASCII syntax, density over decoration. Distilled from Leonxlnx/taste-skill brutalist-skill (Tactical Telemetry mode).
visual-ralph
Visual Ralph orchestration for frontend UI from generated references, static references, or live URL targets, using $ultragoal with built-in visual verdict and pixel-diff evidence until the implementation matches and leaves a reproducible design system.
glance-canonical-layouts
Use this skill to create home screen widgets using Jetpack Glance Canonical Layouts from the Android Platform Samples project, or when asked to implement standard widget layout patterns (including Check List, Image Grid, Snap Scrolling, and Standard Toolbar).
accessibility
Consolidated accessibility skill entrypoint for WCAG 2.2, ARIA Authoring Practices, cognitive accessibility, Section 508, EN 301 549, design intent verification, and the Accessibility Planner workflow.