Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to adityaarsharma/librecrawl-technical-seo-audit-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/adityaarsharma/librecrawl-technical-seo-audit-mcp/main/.claude/skills/librecrawl-audit/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adityaarsharma/librecrawl-technical-seo-audit-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/adityaarsharma/librecrawl-technical-seo-audit-mcp/librecrawl-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/adityaarsharma/librecrawl-technical-seo-audit-mcp/librecrawl-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/adityaarsharma/librecrawl-technical-seo-audit-mcp/librecrawl-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/adityaarsharma/librecrawl-technical-seo-audit-mcp/librecrawl-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/adityaarsharma/librecrawl-technical-seo-audit-mcp/librecrawl-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00143 | $0.02969 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00072 | $0.01484 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00594 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00297 |
Grade A, and why
librecrawl-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 242 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
⚠️ MANDATORY RULES — read first, no exceptions
These are hard rules. If you skip any of them, the audit is broken from the user's perspective even if the MCP call succeeded.
Rule 1: ALWAYS save the zip locally
After librecrawl_audit_zip returns, you MUST decode the content_base64 and write it to a local file on the operator's machine. Use the user's current working directory (or ~/Downloads/<filename>). Use exactly the filename field from the response.
Pseudo-code your runtime should execute:
import base64
local_path = filename # use the filename field from the response, e.g. "example.com-1780572742.zip"
with open(local_path, "wb") as f:
f.write(base64.b64decode(content_base64))
You report the LOCAL path back to the user. NEVER report the zip_path field from the response as the deliverable — that path is on the remote server, not on the operator's local machine. The user cannot open it.
Rule 2: ALWAYS use auto_cleanup=True
Default and only sane choice. The user contract is: server forgets the audit the moment they have the zip. Do NOT pass auto_cleanup=False — it leaves audit data sitting on the remote server. If a user explicitly says "keep the data on the server", confirm twice and only then opt out.
Rule 3: After saving, verify + tell the user the LOCAL path
Pattern your final response on this:
✅ Audit done. Saved locally:
./example.com-1780572742.zip(320 KB · sha256 verified) Contents: SUMMARY.txt + PDF report + 7 CSVs (per-page · sitemap-recon · external-links · content-audit · extended-checks). Server forgot the session — it's not stored anywhere remote.
Do not say:
❌ "Zip created: /home//librecrawl-reports/example.com-XXXX.zip"
That path is on the server. Useless to the user.
librecrawl-audit
Drive the librecrawl-technical-seo-audit-mcp MCP server to produce a complete technical SEO audit of any website. The MCP exposes 37 tools at mcp__librecrawl-posi__* (or whatever the local connector name is in the user's config).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 242 lines · 143 tokens per session scan A d713781b2190
librecrawl-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository adityaarsharma/librecrawl-technical-seo-audit-mcp (39 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 143 tokens to every session and 2,969 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
seo-audit
Audit affiliate blog posts and landing pages for SEO issues. Triggers on: "audit my blog post for SEO", "check my SEO", "SEO review", "improve my rankings", "SEO checklist", "on-page SEO audit", "keyword optimization check", "why isn't my page ranking", "SEO score", "content quality audit", "check my meta tags"…
seo-audit
Audit websites for SEO, technical, content, security, JS rendering, and AI readiness using SEOmator CLI. Returns LLM-optimized reports with health scores across 332 rules and 20 categories, and can diff two audits to show what a deploy changed. Use when analyzing websites, debugging SEO issues, checking site health…
cannibalization-check
Detect keyword cannibalization — queries where multiple pages compete for the same rankings. Use when asked about competing pages, keyword overlap, or cannibalization.
indexing-audit
Audit indexing status across top pages. Use when asked about crawling, indexing issues, or whether pages are indexed by Google.
seo-weekly-report
Generate a complete weekly SEO performance report for a site. Use when asked for a site summary, performance overview, or weekly report.
agent-search
Use Agent Search MCP for free-first English and Chinese web search with compact evidence and minimal tool calls. Trigger for factual discovery, claim verification, Chinese web results, selected-page extraction, provider failures, freshness limits, or search token and spend controls. Choose freesearch…