bugcrowd-reporting

bugcrowd-reporting is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai. It costs 171 tokens per session (4,906 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of bugcrowd-reporting, MIT.

A Bugcrowd-specific guide for choosing vulnerability categories, setting severity, and explaining findings in submissions. Bugcrowd is a platform that manages security testing programs.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for selecting a VRT category, requesting a different severity when justified, and addressing out-of-scope clauses in Bugcrowd reports.
Why use it?
It helps align a report with Bugcrowd’s rating system and program rules when the exact bug category or severity is unclear.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit It is for selecting a VRT category, requesting a different severity when justified, and addressing out-of-scope clauses in Bugcrowd reports.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/bugcrowd-reporting
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai --skill bugcrowd-reporting
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for bugcrowd-reporting

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/bugcrowd-reporting/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/bugcrowd-reporting)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/bugcrowd-reporting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/bugcrowd-reporting/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for bugcrowd-reporting

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/bugcrowd-reporting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/bugcrowd-reporting.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 171 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,906 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 92% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00171 $0.04906
Opus 5 $0.00086 $0.02453
Sonnet 5 $0.00034 $0.00981
Haiku 4.5 $0.00017 $0.00491

Measured 6d ago against content hash 89223e6f624f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

bugcrowd-reporting scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

92% identical to bugcrowd-reporting — 15 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

cursor-claude-codex/skills/bug-hunter/skills/bugcrowd-reporting/SKILL.md · 321 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 321 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

BUGCROWD REPORTING — Program-Specific Tactics

Companion to the generic report-writing skill. Use when working specifically on Bugcrowd submissions where VRT mapping, OOS-clause rebuttals, or per-program target selection matter.

This skill encodes patterns that apply specifically to Bugcrowd's submission flow. For the generic per-platform templates (HackerOne / Bugcrowd / Intigriti / Immunefi report bodies), use the report-writing skill. For the 7-Question Gate before deciding to report at all, use triage-validation.


1. VRT Category Selection — Search & Fallback Strategy

Bugcrowd's submission form requires a single VRT (Vulnerability Rating Taxonomy) selection. The dropdown's default severity is bound to the chosen node — pick wrong and the form auto-suggests P4 when the actual impact is P3 or P2.

1.1 Search hierarchy (try in order, pick the highest-severity match that still describes the bug)

For any finding, search the VRT dropdown with these terms in this order:

  1. The bug's primary class — e.g., IDOR, XSS, SSRF, auth bypass, 2FA bypass
  2. The data category exposed — e.g., PII, sensitive data exposure, disclosure of secrets
  3. The control bypassed — e.g., broken access control, authentication bypass
  4. The endpoint type — e.g., no rate limiting on form > login, no rate limiting on form > change password
  5. The generic parent node — e.g., Server Security Misconfiguration > Other, Broken Access Control > Other

1.2 Pick the highest-severity match that still accurately describes the bug

Never select a VRT that misrepresents the bug just to get a higher default severity. Triagers will reassign and may flag the misrepresentation. The discipline is: pick the most specific accurate VRT, then use §2 (Manual Severity Override) if the default is wrong.

1.3 Common mappings worth knowing

Finding type First-choice VRT Fallback
ATO via missing 2FA on password change Broken Authentication & Session Management → Second Factor Authentication (2FA/MFA) → Bypass Broken Auth → Authentication Bypass → Other
Password oracle without rate limit Broken Authentication & Session Management → Authentication Bypass → Other Server Security Misconfiguration → No Rate Limiting on Form → Login
GraphQL introspection / APQ allowlist bypass Server Security Misconfiguration → Other (justify in body) Broken Access Control → Other
Username → real name PII enumeration Sensitive Data Exposure → PII Leakage / Disclosure of Secrets → Non-Corporate User Broken Access Control → Other
State desync on security-sensitive action Application-Level DoS → Other (with state-desync framing) Server Security Misconfiguration → Other
Email/SMS pumping on auth-flow endpoint Server Security Misconfiguration → No Rate Limiting on Form → Email-Triggering / SMS-Triggering Server Security Misconfiguration → No Rate Limiting on Action
Token brute-force (email-change OTP, password reset) Broken Authentication → Authentication Bypass → Other Server Security Misconfiguration → No Rate Limiting on Action

Read the full file on GitHub · 321 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 321 lines · 171 tokens per session scan A 89223e6f624f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

bugcrowd-reporting is a skill published in the GitHub repository adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai (57 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 171 tokens to every session and 4,906 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to bugcrowd-reporting, differing in 15 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

importing-a-codebase

Use when the repo holds real source code but no specs: the existing-codebase branch of setting-up-a-project, normally reached via that dispatcher, directly only when the situation is unmistakable. Not for empty workspaces (starting-a-new-project) or feature work in a specced project (brainstorming).

JetBrains/thinkrail · 69 tokens

starting-a-new-project

Use when the workspace is empty — no code yet — and the user brings a raw idea: the brand-new branch of setting-up-a-project, normally reached via that dispatcher, directly only when the situation is unmistakable. Not for features in an existing project — use brainstorming instead.

JetBrains/thinkrail · 61 tokens

todos

This chat has a shared, live TODO plan — your tasks for the conversation, which the user also edits. Read this skill and reach for the todo tools whenever a request takes more than a couple of steps. It covers the plan model (group = task, items = its steps; loose items are the user's lane), how to work it: propose…

JetBrains/thinkrail · 127 tokens

writing-workflow-skills

Use when adding a new workflow skill to pi-thinkrail-workflow, changing an existing workflow skill's role, trigger, handoff, or structure, or checking a workflow skill against the workflow system's rules. Not for authoring general-purpose skills outside this package.

JetBrains/thinkrail · 60 tokens

brainstorming

Use this BEFORE any creative or feature work: building a new feature, adding functionality, changing behavior, or making a nontrivial design decision. Turns the user's request into a validated design — recorded as a spec-graph task-spec — before any implementation. Do not skip this because a change looks small.

JetBrains/thinkrail · 65 tokens

reviewing-changes

Use when a review package asks you to review a plan step's change set (todo.startReview): you are the REVIEWER, not the author. How to judge an agent-written diff, file findings with addreviewcomment, and settle with exactly one reviewverdict.

JetBrains/thinkrail · 59 tokens