Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to advanced-security/codeql-development-mcp-server. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/advanced-security/codeql-development-mcp-server/main/.github/skills/validate-ql-mcp-server-tools-queries/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/advanced-security/codeql-development-mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/advanced-security/codeql-development-mcp-server/validate-ql-mcp-server-tools-queries)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/advanced-security/codeql-development-mcp-server/validate-ql-mcp-server-tools-queries"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/advanced-security/codeql-development-mcp-server/validate-ql-mcp-server-tools-queries/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/advanced-security/codeql-development-mcp-server/validate-ql-mcp-server-tools-queries"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/advanced-security/codeql-development-mcp-server/validate-ql-mcp-server-tools-queries.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.03028 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.01211 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00606 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00303 |
Grade A, and why
validate-ql-mcp-server-tools-queries scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 356 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A d6c72e24e568
validate-ql-mcp-server-tools-queries is a skill published in the GitHub repository advanced-security/codeql-development-mcp-server (38 stars, last pushed 5d ago), with no licence file. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 3,028 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-refactoring-advisor
Enterprise code refactoring advisor that detects code smells, anti-patterns, and complexity issues with specific refactoring recommendations, test generation, and maintainability metrics.
implementing-semgrep-for-custom-sast-rules
Write custom Semgrep SAST rules in YAML to detect application-specific vulnerabilities, enforce coding standards, and integrate into CI/CD pipelines.
brooks-sweep
Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user…
brooks-test
Test quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow…
software-code-refactoring
Improve production code quality while preserving all existing test behavior. Commonly used for the Refactor phase of TDD red-green-refactor, but applicable to any codebase with tests. Use when production code works but needs cleanup — reducing duplication, improving naming, simplifying complexity, aligning with…
recipe-add-integration-tests
Add integration/E2E tests to existing codebase using Design Docs.