Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/advanced-security/codeql-development-mcp-server/validate-ql-mcp-server-tools-queriesnpx skills add advanced-security/codeql-development-mcp-server --skill validate-ql-mcp-server-tools-queriesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/advanced-security/codeql-development-mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/advanced-security/codeql-development-mcp-server/validate-ql-mcp-server-tools-queries)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/advanced-security/codeql-development-mcp-server/validate-ql-mcp-server-tools-queries"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/advanced-security/codeql-development-mcp-server/validate-ql-mcp-server-tools-queries.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00071 | $0.03028 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.01514 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00606 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00303 |
Grade A, and why
validate-ql-mcp-server-tools-queries scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 356 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A d6c72e24e568
validate-ql-mcp-server-tools-queries is a skill published in the GitHub repository advanced-security/codeql-development-mcp-server (34 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 3,028 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
implementing-semgrep-for-custom-sast-rules
Write custom Semgrep SAST rules in YAML to detect application-specific vulnerabilities, enforce coding standards, and integrate into CI/CD pipelines.
erase
Guided cleanup of CodeEraser findings — read the reports, verify every candidate against the actual code, delete safely, and prove convergence with ce check. Invoke when the user asks to clean up duplication, dead code, or act on CodeEraser findings.
scan
Scan a project with sentrux to get structural health grades (A-F) across 14 dimensions including coupling, cycles, cohesion, dead code, and test coverage. Use when the user wants to check code quality, architecture health, or before/after an agent session.
code-quality
Python code-quality anti-patterns and review checks: exception-hierarchy correctness, singleton identity comparison, narrow exception handling, wildcard-import avoidance, magic-number naming, and dead-local removal. Use when reviewing or self-reviewing Python code for correctness and readability defects that linters…
audit-quality-gates
Use this skill when the user wants to audit how a project configures its style checkers and static analyzers.
joern-analysis
Use this skill when performing code security analysis with Joern. Guides the workflow for importing code, navigating the CPG, tracing data flows, and finding vulnerabilities.