Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/aegntic/cldcde/github-code-reviewnpx skills add aegntic/cldcde --skill github-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aegntic/cldcdeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00015 | $0.06644 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.03322 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.01329 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00664 |
Grade A, and why
github-code-review scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
const { execSync } = require('child_process'); How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,141 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
GitHub Code Review Skill
AI-Powered Code Review: Deploy specialized review agents to perform comprehensive, intelligent code reviews that go beyond traditional static analysis.
🎯 Quick Start
Simple Review
# Initialize review swarm for PR
gh pr view 123 --json files,diff | npx ruv-swarm github review-init --pr 123
# Post review status
gh pr comment 123 --body "🔍 Multi-agent code review initiated"
Complete Review Workflow
# Get PR context with gh CLI
PR_DATA=$(gh pr view 123 --json files,additions,deletions,title,body)
PR_DIFF=$(gh pr diff 123)
# Initialize comprehensive review
npx ruv-swarm github review-init \
--pr 123 \
--pr-data "$PR_DATA" \
--diff "$PR_DIFF" \
--agents "security,performance,style,architecture,accessibility" \
--depth comprehensive
📚 Table of Contents
- Multi-Agent Review System
- Specialized Review Agents
- PR-Based Swarm Management
- Automated Workflows
- Quality Gates & Checks
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 1,141 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 6ed59c79ed71
github-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository aegntic/cldcde (11 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 6,644 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
hono-core
Hono ultrafast web framework fundamentals - routing, context, handlers, and response patterns for multi-runtime deployment.
github-code-review
Comprehensive GitHub pull-request code review with multi-agent coordination. Use when reviewing a PR or diff, auditing changes for correctness/security/style before merge, or generating actionable inline review comments.
github-code-review
Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination.
tauri-django-react
Agents should invoke this skill for Tauri + Django + React desktop apps, especially backend lifecycle, CORS/auth, frontend integration, mandatory light/dark theming, German/English i18n, build packaging, dual desktop/web deployment, Rust commands, and platform-specific gotchas.
subagent-governance
Delegation admissibility governance for a parent orchestrator. Use when deciding whether to launch, sequence, replace, or accept one or more delegated child runs while preserving role fit, plan-backed worker contracts, one-writer isolation, bounded retry safety, and reviewer finding disposition. Covers admissibility…
html-report
Creates polished self-contained HTML explanation reports for complex, multi-step topics using overview tables, evidence cards, adaptive graphs or diagrams, meaningful SVG/media, and accessible tabs for long pages. Use when the user requests a browser-readable diagnostic report, technical guide, decision analysis…