Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/aegntic/compound-engineering/brainstormingnpx skills add aegntic/compound-engineering --skill brainstorminggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aegntic/compound-engineeringWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aegntic/compound-engineering/brainstorming)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aegntic/compound-engineering/brainstorming"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aegntic/compound-engineering/brainstorming.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00076 | $0.02959 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00038 | $0.01479 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00592 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00296 |
Grade A, and why
brainstorming scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 338 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Brainstorming
This skill provides detailed process knowledge for effective brainstorming sessions that establish WHY we're building something, clarify WHAT to build, and map WHERE it lives in the system -- before diving into HOW to build it.
The brainstorm produces three lynchpin artifacts that anchor all downstream phases:
- Problem Narrative & User Story -- the WHY (consumed by plan, work, and review)
- Architectural Context Map -- the WHERE (consumed by execution agents and reviewers)
- Design Decisions -- the WHAT (consumed by plan for task decomposition)
When to Use This Skill
Brainstorming is valuable when:
- Requirements are unclear or ambiguous
- Multiple approaches could solve the problem
- Trade-offs need to be explored with the user
- The user hasn't fully articulated what they want
- The feature scope needs refinement
- The problem statement is missing or vague (you know WHAT but not WHY)
Brainstorming can be skipped when:
- Requirements are explicit and detailed
- The user knows exactly what they want AND can articulate why
- The task is a straightforward bug fix or well-defined change
Core Process
Phase 0: Assess Requirement Clarity
Before diving into questions, assess whether brainstorming is needed.
Signals that requirements are clear:
- User provided specific acceptance criteria
- User referenced existing patterns to follow
- User described exact behavior expected
- Scope is constrained and well-defined
- Problem and motivation are explicitly stated
Signals that brainstorming is needed:
- User used vague terms ("make it better", "add something like")
- Multiple reasonable interpretations exist
- Trade-offs haven't been discussed
- User seems unsure about the approach
- WHY is missing -- user described a solution but not the problem it solves
If requirements are clear, suggest: "Your requirements seem clear. Consider proceeding directly to planning or implementation."
Phase 1: Understand the Problem and the People
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 338 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A fceeb864bc87
brainstorming is a skill published in the GitHub repository aegntic/compound-engineering (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 2,959 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
a2ui-renderer
Render A2UI (Agent-to-UI declarative surfaces) in CopilotKit v2. Enable the runtime via CopilotRuntime({ a2ui: {...} }), then enable the provider via . Auto-activates via /info — do NOT manually pass renderActivityMessages. createA2UIMessageRenderer ships from @copilotkit/react-core/v2; low-level primitives…
copilotkit-develop
Use when building AI-powered features with CopilotKit v2 -- adding chat interfaces, registering frontend tools, sharing application context with agents, handling agent interrupts, and working with the CopilotKit runtime.
copilotkit-upgrade
Use when migrating a CopilotKit v1 application to v2 -- updating package imports, replacing deprecated hooks and components, switching from GraphQL runtime to AG-UI protocol runtime, and resolving breaking API changes.
channels-setup
Use when a developer wants to build their first CopilotKit Channels agent and get it answering in Slack or Microsoft Teams — "set up a channel", "connect my agent to Slack", "get my agent into Teams", or starting from nothing and wanting a working channel end to end. Covers the whole path: inspecting or scaffolding…
referee
Final arbiter for Bug Hunter. Receives Hunter findings and Skeptic challenges, independently re-reads code, and delivers authoritative verdicts with CVSS scoring and proof-of-concept generation for security findings.
sync-check
Walks the documentation dependency web after a CLI code change and reports which downstream files (skills, SOPs, READMEs, plugin references) are out of sync. Use after fixing a bug, adding a command, changing auth behavior, refactoring, or before committing — and when the user says "sync check", "update docs"…