ECC is a toolkit that organizes and improves how coding agents work through skills, memory, security checks, research practices, and related extensions. It is for developers using agents such as Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and Cursor.
Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/affaan-m/ECCnpx agentmods add skills/affaan-m/ecc/module-regressionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/affaan-m/ecc/module-regression)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/affaan-m/ecc/module-regression"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/affaan-m/ecc/module-regression/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/affaan-m/ecc/module-regression"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/affaan-m/ecc/module-regression.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00082 | $0.01617 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00647 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00323 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00162 |
Grade A, and why
module-regression scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 100 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Module Regression Ledger
When to Activate
- The repository has at least three interdependent modules, or a previous change to A has broken B.
- A change modifies a module's externally observable behavior and must prove both that module and downstream consumers still work.
- The project already has executable tests or reconciliation commands that should be organized by dependency.
Anti-Patterns
- Creating a regression ledger for a small repository with no cross-module dependencies.
- Guessing dependencies manually or treating one scan as permanent truth.
- Replacing executable acceptance-command exit codes with model review.
Related Skills
test-collaboration: TEST-IDs, test assets, and defect-regression evidence.ai-regression-testing: executable regression tests derived from important defects.contract-first: cross-service or cross-client contract verification.change-impact: pre- and post-implementation blast-radius analysis.
Problem
In large projects, modules depend on one another. People and agents often verify only the changed module while downstream consumers fail silently. The defect appears days later when an aggregate, export, or external behavior is wrong.
The remedy is a regression ledger (REGRESSION.md) plus a deterministic audit: after any relevant change, run the changed module and all affected downstream consumers. Delivery requires every command to pass.
Three Required Fields per Module
## Module 03 — Shop Data Cleaning
Downstream consumers: 05-aggregation, 07-final-export
Dependency evidence: `<repository dependency graph or reproducible scan command>`
Regression acceptance command: `pytest tests/test_03.py && python scripts/reconcile.py --module 03`
Propagation rule: external behavior change → run 05 and 07; internal-only change with a green module check → downstream may be exempted
- Downstream consumers — derive them from the repository's dependency graph, build tooling, or a reproducible import/call scan, and record the command or tool. Extraction differs by ecosystem; this skill does not pretend a universal scanner can parse every language. Mark edges
unverifiedwhen they cannot be established mechanically. An affected unverified edge blocks an all-green verdict until a human confirms its scope or the related module is included in the run. - Regression acceptance command — the ledger's core asset. Each module needs an executable command that proves it still works: tests, reconciliation scripts, or golden-sample diffs. Without it, the audit collapses into “the model looked and found no problem.”
- Propagation rule — state which downstream modules must run after a change and when an exemption is justified.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 100 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A 5c3db104f8e4
module-regression is a skill published in the GitHub repository affaan-m/ECC (278,595 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 1,617 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-12.
Other skills, from other repositories
prevent-recurrence
Use when fixing a bug or an accepted code-review finding caused by an agent's mistake or by a pattern agents repeat; when a reviewer catches an agent error; when someone says "this keeps happening" or asks how to stop it; or in post-incident follow-up. Fixes the instance (failing-first test where practical), finds and…
systematic-debugging
4-phase root cause debugging: understand bugs before fixing.
verify-omnigent
Drive Omnigent the way a user does and prove a behavior with recorded evidence, using an isolated server, runner, and mock model plus a feature map of every user entry point. Load before reproducing a user-facing bug, before claiming a fix works, or when reviewing whether a change covered every surface (session vs.…
resolve-author-fix
Find the root cause, implement a focused fix, and prove behavior with targeted tests and recordings.
resolve-repro-audit
Audit a recovered repro patch, assertions, and behavioral baseline before authoring or reviewing.
handoff
Finish a vibe session in symphony-alpha and hand it to whoever picks it up next, usually design and then engineering. Through workers, completes internal scope and Storybook checks, runs lint, typecheck and the existing tests without writing any (it lists the missing tests for engineering), drafts marked edits to…