ag2-eval-comparison

ag2-eval-comparison is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from ag2ai/ag2-skills. It costs 190 tokens per session (1,660 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

An evaluation tool for comparing AG2 agents, models, or prompts. AG2 is a framework for building AI agents; the tool runs several versions and ranks their results.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to compare prompts, model settings, tools, or other agent configurations on the same test tasks. It is for choosing between multiple builds.
Why use it?
It helps you decide which version performs better instead of judging alternatives by looking at isolated examples. It supports both leaderboard comparisons and direct two-way comparisons.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to compare prompts, model settings, tools, or other agent configurations on the same test tasks. It is for choosing between multiple builds.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ag2ai/ag2-skills/ag2-eval-comparison
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ag2ai/ag2-skills --skill ag2-eval-comparison
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ag2ai/ag2-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for ag2-eval-comparison

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ag2ai/ag2-skills/ag2-eval-comparison/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ag2ai/ag2-skills/ag2-eval-comparison)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ag2ai/ag2-skills/ag2-eval-comparison"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ag2ai/ag2-skills/ag2-eval-comparison/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for ag2-eval-comparison

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ag2ai/ag2-skills/ag2-eval-comparison"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ag2ai/ag2-skills/ag2-eval-comparison.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 190 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,660 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00190 $0.01660
Opus 5 $0.00095 $0.00830
Sonnet 5 $0.00038 $0.00332
Haiku 4.5 $0.00019 $0.00166

Measured 10d ago against content hash 89d6f338af0a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ag2-eval-comparison scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/ag2-eval-comparison/SKILL.md · 114 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 114 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Evaluation — comparing builds (variants & pairwise)

When to use

  • Rank N models / prompts / configs on a leaderboardrun_variants
  • Decide which of two is better, head-to-head → run_pairwise with pairwise_judge (LLM) or human_pairwise (people)

For running and grading a single agent (scorers, CI, persistence), use ag2-evaluation.

Install

pip install "ag2[openai,tracing]"

Required. Run this install before delivering the code. If you cannot run commands, state the exact pip install command.

Leaderboard — run_variants

Variants is a frozen dataclass holding a mapping of named Agent instances plus an axis label naming what you varied. Build each agent with the one thing that differs (config, prompt, tools, middleware, …), hold the rest fixed, score each, rank:

from ag2 import Agent
from ag2.config import OpenAIConfig, GeminiConfig
from ag2.eval import Variants, run_variants
from ag2.eval.scorers import agent_judge

board = await run_variants(
    suite,
    variants=Variants(
        {
            "gpt-4o": Agent("a", prompt="Answer helpfully.", config=OpenAIConfig("gpt-4o")),
            "flash":  Agent("a", prompt="Answer helpfully.", config=GeminiConfig("gemini-3-flash-preview")),
        },
        axis="config",                  # label for what was varied (used in summary)
    ),
    scorers=[agent_judge(OpenAIConfig("gpt-4o"), criterion="Helpful and accurate.", key="quality")],
    store_dir="runs",
    repeats=5,                          # optional: N runs per variant for stability
)
print(board.summary("quality"))         # ranked leaderboard
board.best("quality")                   # winning variant name (None if tied)
board.leaderboard("quality")            # list[LeaderboardRow] — variant, score, n, rank
board.results["gpt-4o"]                 # each variant's full RunResult

Vary whatever you like across the agents — set axis to label it (e.g. "config", "prompt", "tools"). Tied scores share a rank; a 3-way tie usually means the eval isn't discriminating — make it harder, or score quality with a judge.

Read the full file on GitHub · 114 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 114 lines · 190 tokens per session scan A 89d6f338af0a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ag2-eval-comparison is a skill published in the GitHub repository ag2ai/ag2-skills (10 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 190 tokens to every session and 1,660 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

research-engineer

An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.

davila7/claude-code-templates · 43 tokens

tika-eval-compare

Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".

apache/tika · 50 tokens

neuron-evaluation-engineer

Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…

neuron-core/neuron-ai · 77 tokens

jetson-validate-image

Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.

NVIDIA/skills · 50 tokens

atmos-validation

Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.

cloudposse/atmos · 31 tokens

skill-benchmark

Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard · 16 tokens