Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ag2ai/ag2-skills --skill ag2-eval-comparisongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ag2ai/ag2-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ag2ai/ag2-skills/ag2-eval-comparison)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ag2ai/ag2-skills/ag2-eval-comparison"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ag2ai/ag2-skills/ag2-eval-comparison/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ag2ai/ag2-skills/ag2-eval-comparison"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ag2ai/ag2-skills/ag2-eval-comparison.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00190 | $0.01660 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00095 | $0.00830 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00038 | $0.00332 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00166 |
Grade A, and why
ag2-eval-comparison scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 114 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Evaluation — comparing builds (variants & pairwise)
When to use
- Rank N models / prompts / configs on a leaderboard →
run_variants - Decide which of two is better, head-to-head →
run_pairwisewithpairwise_judge(LLM) orhuman_pairwise(people)
For running and grading a single agent (scorers, CI, persistence), use ag2-evaluation.
Install
pip install "ag2[openai,tracing]"
Required. Run this install before delivering the code. If you cannot run commands, state the exact
pip installcommand.
Leaderboard — run_variants
Variants is a frozen dataclass holding a mapping of named Agent instances plus an axis label naming what you varied. Build each agent with the one thing that differs (config, prompt, tools, middleware, …), hold the rest fixed, score each, rank:
from ag2 import Agent
from ag2.config import OpenAIConfig, GeminiConfig
from ag2.eval import Variants, run_variants
from ag2.eval.scorers import agent_judge
board = await run_variants(
suite,
variants=Variants(
{
"gpt-4o": Agent("a", prompt="Answer helpfully.", config=OpenAIConfig("gpt-4o")),
"flash": Agent("a", prompt="Answer helpfully.", config=GeminiConfig("gemini-3-flash-preview")),
},
axis="config", # label for what was varied (used in summary)
),
scorers=[agent_judge(OpenAIConfig("gpt-4o"), criterion="Helpful and accurate.", key="quality")],
store_dir="runs",
repeats=5, # optional: N runs per variant for stability
)
print(board.summary("quality")) # ranked leaderboard
board.best("quality") # winning variant name (None if tied)
board.leaderboard("quality") # list[LeaderboardRow] — variant, score, n, rank
board.results["gpt-4o"] # each variant's full RunResult
Vary whatever you like across the agents — set axis to label it (e.g. "config", "prompt", "tools"). Tied scores share a rank; a 3-way tie usually means the eval isn't discriminating — make it harder, or score quality with a judge.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 114 lines · 190 tokens per session scan A 89d6f338af0a
ag2-eval-comparison is a skill published in the GitHub repository ag2ai/ag2-skills (10 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 190 tokens to every session and 1,660 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.