Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ag2ai/ag2-skills --skill ag2-evaluationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ag2ai/ag2-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ag2ai/ag2-skills/ag2-evaluation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ag2ai/ag2-skills/ag2-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ag2ai/ag2-skills/ag2-evaluation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ag2ai/ag2-skills/ag2-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ag2ai/ag2-skills/ag2-evaluation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00173 | $0.01362 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00086 | $0.00681 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00272 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00136 |
Grade A, and why
ag2-evaluation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 118 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Evaluation — run, grade, and track an agent
When to use
- Evaluate / test / benchmark an AG2
Agent, or build a regression / CI gate - Grade answers for correctness, tool use, cost, or subjective quality
- Track a metric across versions (did this change help or regress?)
To compare two-plus builds head-to-head or on a leaderboard, use ag2-eval-comparison.
Install
pip install "ag2[openai,tracing]"
run_agent reconstructs each task's trace from OpenTelemetry spans, so the tracing extra is required. Run this install before delivering the code. If you cannot run commands, state the exact pip install command.
The loop — dataset, agent, scorers, run_agent
import asyncio
from ag2 import Agent
from ag2.config import OpenAIConfig
from ag2.eval import Suite, run_agent
from ag2.eval.scorers import final_answer_matches
suite = Suite.from_list([
{"task_id": "france", "inputs": {"input": "Capital of France?"}, "reference_outputs": {"answer": "Paris"}},
{"task_id": "japan", "inputs": {"input": "Capital of Japan?"}, "reference_outputs": {"answer": "Tokyo"}},
])
agent = Agent("geographer", prompt="Answer with the capital city.", config=OpenAIConfig(model="gpt-4o-mini"))
async def main():
result = await run_agent(
suite, agent=agent,
scorers=[final_answer_matches(field="answer", matcher="contains")],
store_dir="./runs",
)
print(result.summary()) # the scorecard
print(result.pass_rate("final_answer_matches")) # 1.0
asyncio.run(main())
inputs["input"] is the prompt; reference_outputs is the gold answer (a dict — omit it for trace-only checks). Each scorer is a column, looked up by its key.
Scorers
A scorer asks ONE question. Its RETURN TYPE picks the aggregation:
| return | aggregation | accessor |
|---|---|---|
bool |
pass rate | result.pass_rate(key) |
int / float |
mean / p50 / p95 | result.score_stats(key) |
str |
value counts | result.value_counts(key) |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 118 lines · 173 tokens per session scan A 1045b1832018
ag2-evaluation is a skill published in the GitHub repository ag2ai/ag2-skills (10 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 173 tokens to every session and 1,362 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.