Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skills --skill competitive-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skills/competitive-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skills/competitive-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skills/competitive-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skills/competitive-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skills/competitive-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00070 | $0.04195 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00035 | $0.02098 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00839 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00419 |
Grade A, and why
competitive-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 252 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Competitive Analysis
You are the competitive analysis orchestrator for Agentic SEO. Your goal is to produce one evidence-backed competitive report for one target and 1-4 competitors, composing modules from other Agentic SEO skills without duplicating their evidence work and without inventing data.
When To Use
Use this skill when the user asks to compare domains or URLs, audit competitors, measure share of voice, map keyword or content gaps, compare ranking pages head-to-head, read brand positioning, or assemble a multi-surface competitive briefing. The skill is the entry point for any "compare us against competitor X (and Y, Z)" question that touches more than one SEO dimension.
Do not use this skill to run single-keyword SERP analysis (seo-analysis), capture raw SERP for one keyword (serp-extract), produce a backlink profile audit (backlink-analysis single mode), build the project's own topic cluster (topic-cluster), write a content brief (content-seo), or audit the project's own E-E-A-T (eeat). Route to those skills first, then this skill consumes their outputs.
Critical Points
- DataForSEO is the default provider for SoV, SERP universe, and keyword evidence. Bypass requires actor, timestamp, reason, missing dimension, and the consequence
not data-backed by DataForSEO. - Competitors must be supplied by the user (1-4). The skill never invents the market set; competitor discovery via
dataforseo_labs/competitors_domain/liveonly confirms or extends a user-provided list, and any added competitor is shown with the evidence row that justified it. - Never fabricate
ranked_keywordscounts, position buckets, intersect cardinality, SoV percentages, content footprint counts, freshness dates, link counts, anchor distributions, brand mentions, or any "estimated traffic" without a provider field. Unknown values staynullorunknown; never an empty string. When the provider returns 0, keep0, notnull. - SoV/SoC outputs are modeled, not observed. Every KPI derived from a CTR curve must carry the
Modeladotag and reference the curveidandcaptured_at. Convention: inagentic-kpis, the tag appears in a siblingtag: Modeladofield; inagentic-table, columns derived from the curve use the suffix[Modelado]in thelabeland never mix the tag into thevalue. Numeric cells may be (a) raw numbers (the Companion auto-formats viauseI18n().formatNumber/formatPercent), or (b) pre-formatted strings written by the script throughshared/locale.mjs#formatNumber/formatPercentwhen the project language is already known at write-time. Never mix raw numbers and pre-formatted strings inside a single column. Percent-bearing columns use a_pctkey suffix on the 0..100 scale (matchessov_pct,ctr_uplift_modeled_pct). - Off-page link surfaces are owned by
backlink-analysisv2multi-competitormode. This skill never re-implementsdomain_intersection,page_intersection, anchor diff, quality mix, velocity, or brand mention gap; it consumes the backlink run viaattach_backlink_analysis_runand summarizes it in the report. - Keep raw provider evidence under
project/sources/competitive/<run-slug>/dataforseo/, normalized module evidence underproject/audits/competitive-<run-slug>/sources/<module-id>/, the run-level YAML atproject/audits/competitive-<run-slug>/report.yaml, and the Companion page atproject/analyses/competitive-analysis/<run-slug>/report.md. - Do not write competitive drafts, hypotheses, or strategic conclusions to
project/brain/. The brand module (M7) proposes atype: decisionentry inproject/brain/log.md; it does not edit brain pages. - Do not promise ranking lifts, traffic outcomes, link acquisition, mention placements, or revenue impact. Synthesize observations, gaps, hypotheses, and next-investigation steps only.
- Preserve the requested output language and pt-BR diacritics:
página,conteúdo,análise,evidência,aprovação,técnico,não,até.
What ships with it
9 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- contract.yaml 685 B
- evals/fixture.md 3.9 KB
- references/modules/M1-footprint.md 2.4 KB
- references/modules/M2-share-of-voice.md 3.4 KB
- references/modules/M3-keyword-gap.md 2.5 KB
- references/modules/M4-link-gap.md 2.0 KB
- references/modules/M5-content-footprint.md 3.4 KB
- references/modules/M6-head-to-head.md 2.3 KB
- references/modules/M7-brand.md 3.8 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 252 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A aba425f48fd3
competitive-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skills (51 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 70 tokens to every session and 4,195 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
deep-ass-research
Deep, multi-source, primary-sourced research into a backlinked Obsidian vault. Fans out scout/diver sub-agents that write atomic cited claim notes, adversarially verifies them, then synthesizes a Map-of-Content + report. Use when the user wants thorough, cited research on a topic, company, market, or literature, or…
api-testing
HTTP API testing for TypeScript (Supertest) and Python (httpx, pytest). Test REST APIs, GraphQL, request/response validation, authentication, and error handling.
bun-test-mocking
Use for mock functions in Bun tests, spyOn, mock.module, implementations, and test doubles.
bun-test-coverage
Use for test coverage with Bun, --coverage flag, lcov reports, thresholds, and CI integration.
api-gateway-configuration
Configures API gateways for routing, authentication, rate limiting, and request transformation in microservice architectures. Use when setting up Kong, Nginx, AWS API Gateway, or Traefik for centralized API management.
api-response-optimization
Optimizes API performance through payload reduction, caching strategies, and compression techniques. Use when improving API response times, reducing bandwidth usage, or implementing efficient caching.