competitive-analysis

competitive-analysis is a skill for Claude Code from agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skills. It costs 70 tokens per session (4,195 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A workflow for comparing one website or online business with up to four competitors. It combines evidence about search visibility, keywords, content, backlinks, ranking pages, and brand positioning.

In plain words
What is it for?
Comparing SEO visibility, finding keyword and content gaps, reviewing competing pages, assessing backlink differences, and comparing how brands are positioned.
Why use it?
It brings several types of competitor research into one report instead of leaving the findings in separate analyses. The process is designed to use measured evidence rather than invented performance claims.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the agentic-seo plugin — 21 skills, 2 commands, 13 agents, 3 hooks shipped together

Good fit Comparing SEO visibility, finding keyword and content gaps, reviewing competing pages, assessing backlink differences, and comparing how brands are positioned.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skills/competitive-analysis
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skills --skill competitive-analysis
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install agentic-seo, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 21 skills, 2 commands, 13 agents, 3 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for competitive-analysis

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skills/competitive-analysis/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skills/competitive-analysis)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skills/competitive-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skills/competitive-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for competitive-analysis

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skills/competitive-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skills/competitive-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 70 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,195 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00070 $0.04195
Opus 5 $0.00035 $0.02098
Sonnet 5 $0.00014 $0.00839
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00419

Measured 11d ago against content hash aba425f48fd3, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

competitive-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/competitive-analysis/SKILL.md · 252 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 252 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Competitive Analysis

You are the competitive analysis orchestrator for Agentic SEO. Your goal is to produce one evidence-backed competitive report for one target and 1-4 competitors, composing modules from other Agentic SEO skills without duplicating their evidence work and without inventing data.

When To Use

Use this skill when the user asks to compare domains or URLs, audit competitors, measure share of voice, map keyword or content gaps, compare ranking pages head-to-head, read brand positioning, or assemble a multi-surface competitive briefing. The skill is the entry point for any "compare us against competitor X (and Y, Z)" question that touches more than one SEO dimension.

Do not use this skill to run single-keyword SERP analysis (seo-analysis), capture raw SERP for one keyword (serp-extract), produce a backlink profile audit (backlink-analysis single mode), build the project's own topic cluster (topic-cluster), write a content brief (content-seo), or audit the project's own E-E-A-T (eeat). Route to those skills first, then this skill consumes their outputs.

Critical Points

  • DataForSEO is the default provider for SoV, SERP universe, and keyword evidence. Bypass requires actor, timestamp, reason, missing dimension, and the consequence not data-backed by DataForSEO.
  • Competitors must be supplied by the user (1-4). The skill never invents the market set; competitor discovery via dataforseo_labs/competitors_domain/live only confirms or extends a user-provided list, and any added competitor is shown with the evidence row that justified it.
  • Never fabricate ranked_keywords counts, position buckets, intersect cardinality, SoV percentages, content footprint counts, freshness dates, link counts, anchor distributions, brand mentions, or any "estimated traffic" without a provider field. Unknown values stay null or unknown; never an empty string. When the provider returns 0, keep 0, not null.
  • SoV/SoC outputs are modeled, not observed. Every KPI derived from a CTR curve must carry the Modelado tag and reference the curve id and captured_at. Convention: in agentic-kpis, the tag appears in a sibling tag: Modelado field; in agentic-table, columns derived from the curve use the suffix [Modelado] in the label and never mix the tag into the value. Numeric cells may be (a) raw numbers (the Companion auto-formats via useI18n().formatNumber / formatPercent), or (b) pre-formatted strings written by the script through shared/locale.mjs#formatNumber / formatPercent when the project language is already known at write-time. Never mix raw numbers and pre-formatted strings inside a single column. Percent-bearing columns use a _pct key suffix on the 0..100 scale (matches sov_pct, ctr_uplift_modeled_pct).
  • Off-page link surfaces are owned by backlink-analysis v2 multi-competitor mode. This skill never re-implements domain_intersection, page_intersection, anchor diff, quality mix, velocity, or brand mention gap; it consumes the backlink run via attach_backlink_analysis_run and summarizes it in the report.
  • Keep raw provider evidence under project/sources/competitive/<run-slug>/dataforseo/, normalized module evidence under project/audits/competitive-<run-slug>/sources/<module-id>/, the run-level YAML at project/audits/competitive-<run-slug>/report.yaml, and the Companion page at project/analyses/competitive-analysis/<run-slug>/report.md.
  • Do not write competitive drafts, hypotheses, or strategic conclusions to project/brain/. The brand module (M7) proposes a type: decision entry in project/brain/log.md; it does not edit brain pages.
  • Do not promise ranking lifts, traffic outcomes, link acquisition, mention placements, or revenue impact. Synthesize observations, gaps, hypotheses, and next-investigation steps only.
  • Preserve the requested output language and pt-BR diacritics: página, conteúdo, análise, evidência, aprovação, técnico, não, até.

Read the full file on GitHub · 252 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 252 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A aba425f48fd3

Subscribe to this mod's changes

competitive-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skills (51 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 70 tokens to every session and 4,195 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.